Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix E <br /> TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TECHNICAL DATA <br /> LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT <br /> Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort <br /> (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped <br /> delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel <br /> through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various <br /> LOS from A to F. <br /> A. Signalized Intersections <br /> The six LOS grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table E-1. <br /> Additionally,Table E-2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average <br /> stopped delay per vehicle. Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to <br /> represent the minimum acceptable design standard. <br /> B. Unsignalized Intersections <br /> The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a different approach. <br /> The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual includes a methodologgyy for calculating the LOS at <br /> two-way stop-controIled intersections. For these unsignalized intersections,LOS is <br /> defined differently than for signalized intersections in that it is based upon the concept <br /> of"Reserve Capacity" (i.e.,that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). A <br /> qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized <br /> intersection is presented in Table -3. A uantitative definition of LOS for a <br /> unsignalized intersection is presented in Table . <br /> The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic movement or to <br /> shared lane movements. Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been <br /> calculated and their LOS and expected delays determined, an overall evaluation of the <br /> intersection can be made. Normally,the movement having the worst LOS defines the <br /> overall evaluation,but this may be tempered by engineering judgment. An"E"LOS is <br /> generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. <br /> It should be noted that the Draft Traffic Impact Study guidelines has differing levels of <br /> LOS for the minimum acceptable design standard for all intersections (both signalized <br /> and unsignalized) depending upon the relative contribution of project traffic to the <br /> signal warrant. <br /> Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates this methodology is <br /> very conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential <br /> for <br /> that might exist. This is especially true for minor street left turn movements. <br /> For example, thelighway Capacity Manual methodology does not take into account the <br /> effects of vehicle flow platoons that result from upstream signalization. Vehicles <br /> traveling in platoons tend to create greater gaps in the traffic flow that sometimes <br /> provide additional capacity for the side closest to the signal. Therefore, the results of <br /> any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. <br /> Generally,LOS E for the minor street left turn movement is considered to be acceptable <br /> for an unsignalized intersection, although it also indicates that the need for <br /> signalization should be investigated. <br /> E-1 <br />