Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 8.0 <br /> SEISMICITY <br /> A. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> The= site,which lies within the Sacramento-San Joac uin Valley,is located within <br /> the central portion of the tectonic province known as the Sierran block. The interior of <br /> this province is less seismically active than the boundaries, which are associated with <br /> known faults and zones of intense deformation. These active faults include the San <br /> Andreas fault,the Hayward fault,the Calaveras fault, and a portion of the Telsa fault, <br /> west of the province; the Big Pine,Garlock and White Wolf faults to the south; and the <br /> Sierra Frontal system,which includes the Sierra Nevada fault, to the east. These faults <br /> along the margins of the block are the primary sources of major seismic events that <br /> could potentially cause ground shaking at the site. <br /> Seismic events within the Sierran block are characteristically infrequent,of moderate to <br /> low grade magnitude, and associated with small to no surface displacement <br /> (Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1978; Bryant, 1983). Three regional faults within the <br /> Sierran block are: the Stockton fault; the buried Midland fault zone; and the Bear <br /> Mountain fault zone, none of which are shown as active on the State fault map <br /> (Jennings, 1977). These faults are discussed below: <br /> • The Stockton fault is covered by a few thousand feet of continental sediments, <br /> suggesting that there has been no Quaternary movement along this fault,which <br /> is in agreement with the State fault map. <br /> • The Midland fault has been classified as inactive as recently as 1987 (Harwood <br /> and Helley, 1987) because it does not extend through materials deposited since <br /> the early Oligocene epoch, about 35 million years ago. However, it is <br /> increasingly postulated that blind thrust faulting is occurring at depth along <br /> much of the western edge of the Central Valley, and that the Midland fault may <br /> be part of that activity. Some possibility of activity on the Midland fault or a <br /> nearby blind thrust fault,therefore,should be recognized,although such activity <br /> would quite probably have a very long return period. <br /> • The Bear Mountain fault zone has been associated with the Oroville earthquakes <br /> in 1975; therefore, Bolt (1985) suggests that the very low probability that a <br /> moderate earthquake might occur on the Bear Mountain fault zone be considered <br /> in assessing the seismic intensity of the Stockton area. <br /> Most of the ground shaking experienced in the Stockton area was the result of <br /> earthquakes occurring outside the boundaries of the Sierran block. Seismic intensities <br /> in the site vicinity are conservatively estimated as V to VI on the Modified Mercalli <br /> scale (Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1987;Bolt, 1985). Ground surface accelerations in <br /> the area are estimated at less than 0.018 for more than 90 percent of the historical <br /> earthquakes. The highest maximum ground acceleration was estimated as 0.12g for one <br /> f of the historical events. These estimates were based on deterministic analysis of the <br /> historical earthquakes using the attenuation equation by Donovan and Bornstein(1975). <br /> 8-1 <br />