Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of <br /> Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] <br /> From: Gebrehawariat, Tadese [TGebrehawariat@ciwmb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:19 AM <br /> To: Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] <br /> Cc: Karl, Christine <br /> Subject: RE: Lovelace Transfer Station <br /> Hi Natalia - Nice to meet you, at least by e-mail initially. For your information, for all permitting type of questions <br /> from your jurisdiction the contact Board staff is my colleague, Christine Karl [916.341-6405] or <br /> ckarl@ciwmb.ca.gov. <br /> With regards to the question of the TPR Amendment you approved on May 18, 2007, it sounds like you are <br /> indicating that the operator has decided not to implement the change(s) they had proposed in the Amendment. <br /> Did you require the TPR Amendment, or did the operator proposed it for their needs? What will be the impact on <br /> the design and/or operation of the facility, if the operator fails to implement the change(s)? Would it be their wish <br /> to withdraw the TPR Amendment application, if they are not planning to implement it? However, if it was your <br /> requirement that they submit the TPR Amendment and relocate the electronics recycling from the south to the <br /> northeast area of the station for your reasons, it becomes a different issue. <br /> At this point, it is still a discussion among the three of us -you, Christy, and me. So, give us a bit more <br /> information regarding why the TPR Amendment application was submitted and processed. Why they don't want <br /> to implement the change (if I understand your message correctly)? And what would be your preferred approach, <br /> under the circumstances? <br /> From: Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] [mailto:nsubbotnikova@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:02 AM <br /> To: Gebrehawariat,Tadese <br /> Subject: Lovelace Transfer Station <br /> Hi Tadese, <br /> I have a question regarding Lovelace Transfer Station.After my last inspection at this facility on 6/25/07 1 got an <br /> impression that very possible they are not going to follow the Notice of Change to the TPR. <br /> Just a quick reminder, on May 18, 2007 we approved the amendment to the TPR. The amendment proposes to <br /> relocate the current electronics recycling area from the recycling materials staging area south of the station, which <br /> is also used for appliance processing, to the staging area northeast of the station to free-up space due to multiple <br /> diversion activities. <br /> If this is the case, what would be the best way to deal with this situation? <br /> Thanks. <br /> 7/19/2007 <br />