Laserfiche WebLink
V. IMPACT OVERVIEW <br /> TABLE V-1 <br /> COMPARISON OF THE MITIGATED IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ALTERNATIVESa <br /> Alternative 1: Alternative 2: Alternative 3: <br /> Impact Proposed Project No Project Reduce-Scale Off-Site <br /> G. Public health and Safety(continued) <br /> 4. Expansion of the transfer station would have the LS —N —LS =LS <br /> potential to encourage or provide habitat or food for <br /> vectors such as rodents, birds and insects. <br /> Comparisons to Project Comparisons to Setting <br /> + Greater impact than that of the proposed project LS Less than significant adverse impact after mitigation <br /> Lesser impact than that of the proposed project SU Significant and unavoidable adverse impact after mitigation <br /> Same(or similar)impact as that of the proposed project N No impact or negligible impact <br /> +/= Approximately the same impact as or potentially greater impact than that of the proposed project * Not applicable <br /> —/= Approximately the same impact as or potentially lesser impact than that of the proposed project B Beneficial <br /> ? Magnitude of change relative to the project or level of significance cannot be determined <br /> a Significance levels for the project and the alternatives reflect the levels of significance after mitigation. Symbols indicate maximum impact during construction and operation, <br /> unless otherwise specified. <br /> Stockton Scavenger TranaJer S1ulion Expansion V.13 ESA/990/90 <br />