Laserfiche WebLink
Transfer/Processing Report <br /> Tracy Material Recovery and Transfer Facility <br /> 30703 5. MacArthur Drive, Tracy, California 95377 <br /> COMPLIANCE WITH STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS <br /> AND SITE CONTROLS <br /> I. Methods to Comply with State Minimum Standards <br /> 18221.6(1) description of the methods used by the facility to comply with <br /> each state minimum standard contained in sections 17406.1 through 17419.2 <br /> The Tracy Material Recovery and Transfer Facility will comply with state minimum <br /> standards and the conditions of the conditional use permit, and all other state and <br /> local laws. The following sections of the TPR are described in order as required by <br /> state regulations. <br /> Siting on Landfills <br /> The Facility is not located on top of a landfill, partially closed landfill, or the <br /> intermediate cover of a landfill. <br /> General Design Requirements <br /> The design of the Facility utilized expert advice, as appropriate, from persons <br /> competent in engineering, architecture, landscape design, traffic engineering, air <br /> quality control, and design of structures. <br /> The Transfer/Processing Report was prepared under supervision of Evan W.R. <br /> Edgar, Registered Civil Engineer 42053 in the State of California. Evan W.R. <br /> Edgar is the Principal Civil Engineer for Edgar & Associates, Inc. and has over 20 <br /> years of professional solid waste experience. <br /> The design of Facility was based on appropriate data regarding the expected <br /> service area, anticipated nature and quantity of wastes to be received, <br /> climatological factors, physical settings, adjacent land use (existing and planned), <br /> types and number of vehicles anticipated to enter the operation or facility, <br /> adequate off-street parking facilities for transfer vehicles, drainage control, the <br /> hours of operation and other pertinent information. The facility will be not used by <br /> the general public, but the design of the facility took into account the safety <br /> features that may be needed to accommodate the general public. <br /> The Facility was designed in such a manner as to minimize the propagation or <br /> attraction of flies, rodents or other vectors and the creation of nuisances by reason <br /> of solid wastes being handled at the operation. Other factors that were taken into <br /> consideration were dust control, noise control, public safety, and other pertinent <br /> matters related to the protection of public health at the facility. The operational <br /> 24 <br />