ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5) Earlier-analyses.'iiay be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,-or other CEQA process, an effect .•has, been adequately analyzed in .an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review: b) Impacts;Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and'adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were'addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier'analysis. c)' " Mitigation.Measu'res. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe-the' mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies ate encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts,(e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, 'where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other,sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is.•oniy a sgggested:form, anO lead,,agencies are free to use different formate; however, lead agencies should`inormally:•address the=questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's enviropmental effcts in whatever format is.selected. 9.)' ', The explanatiorl..of•each issue should.identify: a) the signitocance criteria or thieshotd, if any, used to evaluate each question; acid b) the mitigation measure iderAifiedilf any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Less Than Significant • Potentially With Less Than. Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact M. t I. AESTHETICS. Would the:project:. a) :f Haveasubstantial adverse X effect 6na scenic vista? b) J. Substantially damage scenic .. :. X resources, including, but not ' fiimited:;to,trees, rock. :.autcroppings, end historic :buildigas within-a.state scenic highway? C) Substantially degrade the ❑ El X existiQ:'visual-character or quality.of the site and its surroundings?:. d) Create a new source of ❑ ED X El substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? -. •Lr ;.