Laserfiche WebLink
Comments: <br /> a-d) No archeological or historical remains are believed to exist on the site, which has been <br /> thoroughl}.;graded and excavated in its previous use as an aggregate mine. No other <br /> features of-paleontological or cultural value exist at the site. No impacts to cultural <br /> resources:are anticipated from the project. <br /> Less Than <br /> s. Significant <br /> Potentially With. Less Than <br /> - Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Vi. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the <br /> project: <br /> a) Expose people or structures to E X <br /> potential substantial adverse <br /> effects, including the risk of <br /> loss, injury or death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known X <br /> earthquake fault, as <br /> delineated on the most <br /> recent Alquist-Priolo <br /> F-arthquako Fault Zoning <br /> 4ap issued by the State <br /> Opplogist for the area or, <br /> buc�ed.on other substantial, <br /> evidence of.a.known fault? <br /> Refer to Division of Mines <br /> and Geology Special• <br /> Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strang seismic ground E X El <br /> shaking? . <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground ❑ ❑ X El <br /> failure, including <br /> ligvefaction? . <br /> iv); L�ndslides? ; El El X E <br /> b) Result in substantial soil E X <br /> erosioj;or the loss of topsoil? <br /> c) Be looted on a geologic.unit or X <br /> soil t4gis unstable, or that <br /> would.Ocome,unstable'as a <br /> resultegf•the project, and <br /> potenti011y.resuR in on-or;,off- <br /> site lajodslide, lateral spreadirzg, <br /> subsidg.nce, ligVefaction or <br /> collapse? ; .. <br />