Laserfiche WebLink
Comments: <br />a-d) No archeological or historical remains are believed to exist on the site, <br />which has been <br />thoroughly;graded and excavated in its previous use as <br />an aggregate mine. No other <br />features of,paleontological or cultural value <br />exist at the site. No impacts to cultural <br />resources.-are anticipated from the project. <br />Less Than <br />J'. <br />Significant <br />Potentially <br />With. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Mitigation <br />Significant <br />No <br />Issues: <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Impact <br />Impact <br />VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the <br />project: <br />a) Expose people or structures to <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />X <br />❑ <br />potential substantial adverse <br />effects, including the risk of <br />loss, injury or death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />X <br />❑ <br />earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most <br />recent Alquist-Priolo <br />,.; two rthquak8 Fault Zoning} <br />, <br />fv�ap issued by the State <br />Oeplogist for the area or, <br />t?gped. on other substantial . <br />evidence of.a.known fault? <br />Refer to Division of Mines <br />and Geology Special • <br />Publication 42. <br />_ <br />Strang seismic ground <br />❑ <br />X <br />❑ <br />shaking? . <br />iii) Seismic-related ground <br />❑ <br />® <br />X <br />❑ <br />failure, including <br />ligpefaction? '. <br />iv); Landslides? ; <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />X <br />❑ <br />b) Result•in substantial soil <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />X <br />❑ <br />erosion ;or the doss of topsoil? <br />c) Be located on a geologic.unit or <br />El❑ <br />X <br />El <br />Utai-is unstable, or that <br />would;jecome;unstable'as a <br />result-f •the project, and <br />potenolly.,resuR in on- or;,off- <br />site landslide, lateral spreadirg, <br />subsidegce, liq'Vefaction or <br />collapse? , .. <br />