Laserfiche WebLink
06 January 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0559 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> peziometric depression located in the vicinity of the former UST area(Figure 3)at a gradient varying <br /> from 0 016 ft/ft to 0 07 ft/ft <br /> HU3 and HU4 In the wells representing HU3 and HU4, the depth to ground water ranged from <br /> 55 96 to 58 49 feet btoc The ground water elevation was calculated at between 29 77 feet(MW-7B) <br /> and 31 11 feet (MW-5B)below MSL,the ground water elevation from wells in this hydrogeologic <br /> interval averaged 30 55 feet below MSL, a decrease of 1 foot since the last quarterly monitoring <br /> event Ground water was inferred to be flowing south-southwest at a gradient of 0 009 ft/ft <br /> (Figure 4) <br /> HU5 Within the upper portion of HU5 (Upper HU5), screened between 125 and 135 feet bsg, <br /> ground water elevation ranged between 29 90 feet(MW-7C)and 30 92 feet(MW-5C)below MSL, <br /> the ground water elevation averaged 30 40 feet below MSL, a decrease of 0 4 feet since the last <br /> monitoring event Ground water at the former UST release was inferred to be flowing toward the <br /> west-southwest at a gradient of 0 005 ft/ft (Figure 5) <br /> Within the lower portion of HUS (Lower HU5), screened between 148 and 160 feet bsg, ground <br /> water elevation ranged between 29 86 feet (MW-7D) and 30 94 feet (MW-6D) below MSL, the <br /> ground water elevation averaged 30 57 feet below MSL, a decrease of 0 08 feet since the last <br /> monitoring event Ground water was determined to be flowing toward the south-southeast at a <br /> hydraulic gradient of 0 011 ft/ft (Figure 6) <br /> HU6 In the wells representing HU6,the depth to ground water ranged between 56 09 and 56 98 feet <br /> btoc The ground water elevation was calculated between 31 49 feet (MW-5E) and 3167 feet <br /> (MW-7E) below MSL, the ground water elevation from wells in this hydrogeologic unit averaged <br /> 31 59 feet below MSL, an increase of 0 28 feet since the last quarterly monitoring event Ground <br /> water was inferred to be flowing toward the east at a hydraulic gradient of 0 002 ft/ft (Figure 7) <br /> 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br /> Ground water samples were analyzed by CTEL for the chemical constituents referenced in <br /> Section 2 2 The following is a summary of the analytical results <br /> HU1 and HU2 TPH-g was detected in wells MW-1 through MW-4 and wells MW-5A through <br /> MW-7A at concentrations ranging from 12,00 micrograms per liter (µg/1) in the ground water <br /> samples from wells MW-5A and MW-6A to 4,300,000 µg/1 in the sample from well MW-2 BTEX <br /> compounds were detected at maximum concentrations of 220,000 µg/1 benzene, 800,000 µg/1 <br /> toluene, 330,000 µg/1 ethyl-benzene and 1,350,000 µg/l total xylenes in sample MW-2 In addition, <br /> the following fuel additives were detected MTBE was detected in all samples at concentrations <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />