Laserfiche WebLink
' BURfEnwronmental Management Inc U-14aul#709-50 <br /> 002-70950-02 <br /> Semi-Annual Report <br /> 12/14/00 <br />' 4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> Blaes Environmental conducted two groundwater monitoring events at U-Haul facility #709-50 in June <br /> and September 2000 Groundwater level measurements collected during the two monitoring events <br /> indicated that the groundwater elevation dropped approximately seven feet from June 26 to September 26, <br /> 2000 On June 26, 2000, the groundwater level at the site ranged from 24 49 to 26 23 feet below mean <br /> sea IeveI The corresponding groundwater flow direction was toward the northwest with an estimated <br /> gradient of approximately 0 0625 feet per foot(Figure 3) On September 26, 2000, the groundwater level <br /> at the site ranged from 32 24 to 32 58 feet below mean sea level The corresponding September <br /> groundwater gradient was relatively flat with no apparent flow direction Due to the change In water <br /> level from June to September, the upper "A" casing wells did not contain water during the September <br /> monitoring event <br /> IDissolved oxygen measurements from the two monitoring events indicated that the lower casing wells <br /> typically contained higher levels of dissolved oxygen with concentrations greater that 10% The <br /> exceptions to this trend were measurements from monitor well MW-4, where elevated hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations may have influenced dissolved oxygen concentrations <br /> Analysis of groundwater samples from both monitoring events revealed similar results Groundwater <br /> Isamples from monitor well MW-3A In June and MW-313 in September both contained the highest <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbons detected In the suite of samples collected from the site These results <br /> suggest that a source point for hydrocarbon impact to the groundwater surface appears to be near monitor <br /> well MW-3A The other consistency in results was visible in the figures showing the extent of <br /> I hydrocarbons (Figures 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9) Comparing the extent of hydrocarbons between the casings <br /> interfacing with the groundwater surface (casings "A" In June and casing "B" In September) and the <br /> lower casings, both monitoring events revealed a shift In concentrations from beneath the dispenser island <br /> to the western portion of the site The extent of hydrocarbons at the groundwater surface from both <br /> monitoring events appeared to be defined to the northwest and north Samples from the lower casings <br /> indicated the presence of hydrocarbons across the site <br /> 15 <br />