My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012031
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 10:53:15 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 8:30:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012031
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> i20 May 1998 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br /> iPage 2 of 5 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br />' The round water levels i m W-1 W- W-1 VW-2A and VW-3A, <br /> A <br /> g n monitoring wells M through M 5,V C, , <br /> i achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge recovery prior to sample collection Ground water <br /> samples were collected utilizing disposable polyethylene bailers and new nylon rope Sufficient <br /> ground water sample was collected from each well to fill three EPA-approved 40-m1 VOA vials <br /> i containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a preservative for the samples Caie was taken to ensure <br /> that visible air bubbles were not present in the VOA vials after filling and capping Ground water <br /> sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> i <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> iEach ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed In a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis in accordance with EPA Methods <br /> i9 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH- <br /> g), <br /> i• . 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene BTE&X) with <br /> methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), and <br /> i • 8260 for volatile organics (including oxygenates) <br /> The laboratory report(Castle Analytical Laboratory Reference No 86910 to 86917 and McCampbell <br /> Analytical Inc Lab I D 86910 to 86917) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 1 <br /> i3.0. FINDINGS <br /> 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> iThe depths to ground water in wells MW-1 through MW-5, VW-1C, VW-2A and VW-3A were <br /> measured at 43 98 to 45 91 feet below the top of well casings Between December 1997 and March <br />' 1998, ground water elevation increased an average 2 83 feet at the site The ground water elevation <br /> data for MW-I though MW-5 during the March 1998 ground water monitoring event is depicted in <br /> Figure 3 <br /> iDuring the March 1998 monitoring event, ground water was between 16 02 and 2 09 feet above the <br /> top of screened intervals from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 and VW-1 C As a result, the <br />' screened intervals from these wells are completely submerged, and may not yield water samples <br /> fully representative of ground water conditions near the top of the saturated zone where fuel <br /> Advanced GeoEnvlronmental,Inc <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.