Laserfiche WebLink
• 101 S Wilson Way, Stockton <br /> Page 2 <br /> Tne faxed analytical results for MW6 and MW7 or the sampling event that tools place at this site on <br /> December 12, 2001, show MtBE as high as 21,000 ug/i in MW6A and BTEX and TPH-g in all the <br /> ground water samples collected <br /> The consultant for the ARCO at 130 S Wilson Way, Stockton, completed a well survey and reported <br /> the results in August 2001 There are three inactive and one active well operated by California Water <br /> Service down gradient and within 2000 feet of their site and your site <br /> According to Step 3 within the State Water Resources Control Board Guidelines for Investigation and <br /> Cleanup of MtSE and other Oxygenates (Guidelines) final draft dated 30 March 2000, es with <br /> persistent concentrations of MtBE over 10,000 ppb should perform interim remediation o reduce the <br /> concentrations and mass before the plume can spread <br /> MtSE nas been detec-led in groundwater samples from VINSB and MW6A at concentrations anove <br /> 10,000 ppb, so interim remediation should be proposed for this site_ <br /> Tne Quarterly Reports recommend performance of a ground water aquifer pumping test to predict <br /> general aquirer characteristics at the site in order to design an interim ground water pump and treat <br /> remediation system The pump test data along with the other site geologic data should also be used <br /> Dto the approximate travel time for the contaminant plume to reach nearby receptors. If the <br /> wca n�irit travel time to the nearest receptor is estimated to be less than 5 years, then a remedial <br /> action plan should be implemented in less than a year <br /> An eight hour vapor extraction test was performed on VW 1 S (screened interval 28 to 43 feet) in <br /> January 1996 when first groundwater was about 55 feet below surface grade A Corrective Action <br /> Plan —March 1996 was submitted to EHD in Apnl 1996, which recommended vapor extraction and air <br /> sparging In a letter dated October 22, 1956, EHD requested a specific design and cost estimate for a <br /> modified remediation system be suDmitted for review An August 13, 1997, Quarterly Report states <br /> that a Remedial Action Work Plan dated July 3, 1997, was submitted to EHD for this site EHD files do <br /> not contain that work plan <br /> Remedial options of vapor extraction, air sparging, groundwater extraction, and ozone inlection should <br /> all be evaluated for this site A work plan to install any wells necessary to evaluate these alternatives <br /> along with a pian for performing tests for these alternatives snould be submitted to EHD by March 4, <br /> 2002 In addition, the lateral and vertical extent of the soil and grouncwater contamination must <br /> continue to be investigated The work plan submitted should include installation of adtittienal <br /> -onitcring weirs thhat will define the extent of the contamination at and emanating from this site <br /> Please be advised that groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW3, MW4 and MW14 at 102 S <br /> Wilson Way, Stockton, which is across the street and down gradient from this site have increasing <br /> concentrations of MTBE that may be emanating from this site_ Please work with the responsible <br /> parties and consultants for the sites at 102 S Wilson Way and 130 S Wilson Way, Stockton, to <br /> determine current and previous groundwater flow direction and provide delineation of the contaminant <br /> plumes for each site <br /> If you have any questions or comments call Rebecca E Setliff at(299) 468-3440 <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Pev6'ronme <br /> tal Health Departmenttecca E get:W-hHS Margaret l_agono, Supervising RENS <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV LOP/Site Mitigation Unit 1V <br /> cc Marty Hartzell, CVRWQC8 <br /> ✓T smothy J Cuellar, Advanced Geo Erivironmental, Inc <br />