Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I26 March 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> were calculated to be between 22 64 feet and 23 23 feet below mean sea level Ground water <br /> elevation at the site decreased an average 2 22 feet between the June 2000 and the October 2000 <br /> ground water monitoring events The ground water elevation data for MW-1 through MW-5 during <br /> the October 2000 ground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3 <br /> Ground water monitoring data collected at Top Filling Station wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated <br /> a ground water flow direction generally toward the east-northeast at a gradient of 0 005 ft/ft or less, <br /> or approximately 26 feet or less per mile (Figure 3) <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF MONITORING WELL GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of nine ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in October 2000 <br /> TPH-g was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-3,MW-4,MW-5, VW-1B,VW-1C, <br /> VW-2A and VW-3A at concentrations ranging between 400 and 240,000 micrograms per liter(E.cg/1), <br /> the laboratory reported each TPH-g chromatogram as having unmodified or weakly modified <br /> gasoline patterns <br />�. BTEX compounds were detected in water samples collected from wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, <br /> MW-5, VW-1B, VW-1C, VW-2A and VW-3A at concentrations as high as 57,000,ug/l (toluene, <br /> VW-1B) The greatest benzene-impact was detected from well VW-1C at a concentration of 39,000 <br /> MTBE was detected in ground water samples collected from wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, VW-113, <br /> VW-1C,VW-2A and VW-3A at concentrations as high as 9,1001ug/l, TBA was detected in a water <br /> sample collected from well MW-5 at a concentration of 100 µg/1 No other fuel oxygenated <br /> compounds were detected in any other ground water samples <br /> 1,2-DCA was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-2, MW-3, VW-1B, VW-1C and <br /> VW-2A at concentrations as high as 260,ug/l Previous and current analytical results of ground water <br /> monitoring well samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3, the estimated extent of dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons is depicted in cross sectional views C-C' and D-D' (Figures 6 and 7, <br /> respectively) The laboratory reports (McCampbell Analytical Inc I D No 51917 through 51925) <br /> and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix,B <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the October 2000 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • <br /> Groundwater monitoring data collected in the area of wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated <br /> Advanced Geo Environmental,Inc <br />