My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012082
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 11:05:11 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 8:39:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012082
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />' 23 April 2003 <br /> S AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br />' Page 4 of 6 <br />' EDB was detected in water samples collected from VW-1 C and VW-2A at concentrations of49,ug/l and <br /> 12,ug/l, respectively <br />' No other fuel components were detected In the ground water samples Previous and current analytical <br /> results ofground water monitoring well samples are summarized in Tables 3 and 4 The laboratory reports <br /> (Castle Analytical Laboratory Reference No 5290)and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix <br />' B <br /> i <br /> i <br /> I4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> IThe Implications from the December 2002 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • Ground water flow direction was Inferred to be towards the northeast at a gradient of 0 005 fl/ft <br /> in the area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-5 Due to the low gradient at the site, slight <br /> variations in ground water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge ofthe local ground <br /> water could greatly modify the Inferred ground water flow direction <br />� . • The decrease of ground water elevation of approximately 124 feet between the September 2002 <br /> and the December 2002 monitoring events maybe due to seasonal ground water fluctuation or a <br />' longer-term drought cycle,decreasing ground water elevations have generallybeen reported at the <br /> site since the May 2001 monitoring event <br /> • Ground water at the site is above the screen Intervals of wells MW-i through MW-5,MW-6 <br /> (B-E), MW-7 (B-E), VW-1C, VW-2A and VW-3A (I a screened below ground water <br /> elevation),and may not yield samples fully representative of shallowest ground water conditions <br /> The ground water table appeared to be within the screen interval ofwells MW-6A and MW-7A <br /> and should be representative of shallowest ground water conditions <br /> • The greatest concentrations of dissolved TPH-g and BTEX were detected in samples collected <br /> from wells VW- C,VW-2A and MW-7B(Figure 4)which is consistent with previous monitoring <br /> results, TPH-g concentrations were detected as high as 200,000 fcg/l <br /> I0 The greatest concentrations of dissolved MTBE was detected in the sample collected from well <br /> MW-6A(Figure 5)which is located immediately east of the former UST pit No 1 Reported <br /> I concentrations of MTBE have not demonstrated an increasing or decreasing trend during the <br /> ground water monitoring program, ranging between 14,000 yg/l and 55,000,ug/1 <br /> • Significant concentrations of 1,2-DCA were detected or have consistently been detected from <br /> wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-6B, MW-6C, MW-7A, MW-7B, VW-lB, VW-lC, VW-2A, <br /> . VW-2B and VW-3A suggesting a significant 1,2-DCA-impact to ground water at the site <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.