My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012105
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 11:23:49 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 8:48:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012105
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I - <br /> 29 December 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br />' Page 5 of 10 <br />' 3 1 REMEDIATION SYSTEM PROCEDURES <br /> The SVE system utilized a manifold network of two-inch diameter, Schedule 40 PVC piping <br />' installed underground from SVE wells VW-1 through VW-3 to the inlet of the SVE remediation <br /> system The SVE remediation system consists of a Solleco Ecat 250 catalytic oxidizer vapor <br /> recovery system <br />' In order to monitor efficiency of the SVE system, 1) a Magnehelic vacuum gauge (Dwyer DS-200 <br /> flow sensor) was installed prior to the inlet of the SVE unit so that air flow is monitored, the flow <br />' rate was determined from the measured differential pressure and the piping diameter using a <br /> nomograph (Appendix B), 2) SVE air flow of the influent and effluent streams were monitored <br /> routinely for the presence of organic vapor using an organic vapor analyzer(OVA) equipped with <br />' a photo-ionization detector(PID Thermo Environmental 580B, 10 0 eV,calibrated to isobutylene), <br /> and 3) influent and effluent air flow vapor stream samples were collected from sampling ports <br /> installed upstream(influent)of the vacuum blower and downstream(effluent)ofthe carbon camsters <br />' and submitted for laboratory analysis Field measurements were recorded at regular intervals and are <br /> summarized in Table 6 <br />' Between 31 August and 01 October 2004, an induced vacuum was selectively applied to SVE wells <br /> (VW-1 through VW-3)to extract hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface Following the first week <br /> of operation(start-up), SVE wells VW-2B and VW-3B were each closed at the well-head due to the <br />' intense petroleum hydrocarbon vapor encountered when extracting from all three wells (Table 6), <br /> therefore, SVE well VW-1AB was the sole SVE well utilized between 08 September and 01 <br />' October 2004 <br />' 32 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF VAPOR EXTRACTION AIR FLOW SAMPLES <br /> A total of three sets of extracted air flow vapor samples were collected on 31 August,22 September <br />' and 01 October 2004 from the influent and effluent of the catalytic oxidizer vapor recovery system <br /> to measure concentrations of hydrocarbon vapor The samples were collected in Tedlar bags utilizing <br /> an electric air-vacuum pump <br />' Following sample collection,the samples were properly labeled, placed in a covered container and <br /> transported under chain of custody to CTEL, a DHS-certified laboratory in California Each sample <br />' was analyzed within 72 hours of collection for TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA <br /> Methods 8015M and 8021 <br />' Advanced CcoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.