|
CPT Interpretations
<br /> . Table 2 References
<br /> No Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson P K and Campanella,R G, 1966,"Guidelines for Use Interpretation and Application of
<br /> the CPT and CPTU", UBC,Soil Mechanics Series No 105,Civil Eng Dept,Vancouver
<br /> B C Canada
<br /> 2 Robertson P K,Campanella, R G,Giilespie,D and Greig,J , 1986,"Use of Piezometer Corte
<br /> Data', Proceedings of InSitu 86 ASCE Specialty Conference Blacksburg,Virginia
<br /> 3 Robertson,P K and Campaneifa,R G, 1989 "Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT and
<br /> CPTU", UBC, Sod Mechanics Series No 120,Civi}Eng Dept Vancouver, B C Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson,—P-r,- 1990 `Sod Classrficatlon Using the Cone Penetration Test Canadian Geotechnical
<br /> Journal,Volume 27
<br /> 5 Robertson P K and Fear C E, 1895 "Liquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation", Keynote Lecture,
<br /> First Intemational Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,Tokyo,Japan
<br /> 6 Gregg In Situ Intemai Report
<br /> 7 Robertson P K^and Wnde,C E,1997 "Cyclic Liquefaction and its Evaluation Based on SPT and
<br /> CPT",NCEER Workshop Paper,January 22 1997
<br /> 6 Wnde,C E and Robertson P K,1997,"Phase 11 Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sites,
<br /> Fraser River Delta) , Volume 1 -Data Report(June 1997),University of Alberta
<br /> 9 lewes 1-I D,Dawes M P and Jeffenes, M G 1992, 'CPT Based Screening Procedure for
<br /> Evaluating Liquefaction Susceptibility,45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,Toronto,
<br /> Ontario, October 1992
<br /> EGG
<br />
|