My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012262
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 11:25:10 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 8:59:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012262
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> t <br /> f 20 March 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br /> Page 13 of 23 <br />' suspended for at least two to three weeks if off-site disposal is selected, and as much as six to twelve <br /> months if on-site treatment and backfilling is selected Other disadvantages include air pollution <br />' control concerns, backfilling and compaction costs <br />' 6 2 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR EXCAVATION <br />' At the subject site, impacted soil could not be excavated with traditional equipment Shoring and <br /> engineering of the excavation would be required Approximately 20,000 cubic yards of soil would <br /> have to be excavated from the site, of which approximately 5,000 cubic yards would require <br />' treatment or disposal Approximately 15,000 cubic yards of excavated soil would be "clean' <br /> overburden <br /> However, since the hydrocarbon-impacted soil extends off-site, it is unlikely that all of the impacted <br /> soil can be removed, thereby leaving impacted soil as a potential source of hydrocarbon-impact on <br /> the ground water <br /> Once excavated, the soil must then be treated on-site or disposed of off-site Replacement backfill <br /> material must be imported if off-site disposal is chosen The cost for excavation, treatment/disposal <br /> and backfilling would likely be between $80 00 and $120 00 per cubic yard, depending upon <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbons Total costs for excavation and treatment or disposal could therefore <br /> approach $750,000 00 <br /> 6 3 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION <br /> Acceptance of this treatment technology by the regulatory community has grown in recent years, as <br /> success has been achieved at sites in California and elsewhere <br /> 6 3 1 PRINCIPLES <br /> The bioremediation method utilizes hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, which are propagated in a liquid <br /> medium and then injected into inoculation wells screened through the interval of contamination If <br /> ground water has been impacted, strategically located ground water monitoring wells can be used for <br /> inoculation Once in the contaminant plume, the bacteria degrade the hydrocarbons and spread <br /> laterally and vertically by migrating and reproducing, creating an advancing remediation front <br /> Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria metabolize hydrocarbons and assimilate the resulting organic <br /> chemicals into biomass for reproduction and growth, and release water and carbon dioxide as waste <br /> products The light-end hydrocarbons are consumed first, followed by heavier hydrocarbon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.