My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008838
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
2358
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543607
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008838
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 10:40:06 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:16:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008838
RECORD_ID
PR0543607
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006343
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MOBIL 3*
STREET_NUMBER
2358
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14118221
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2358 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ultramar#419 page 2 <br /> 2350 E Waterloo Rd , Stockton <br /> tIn conversations with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Clean Up Fund <br /> (CUF) staff, it was discussed that Ultramar's assertive proposals to possibly install <br /> multiple, dual-casing soil vapor extraction wells could be interpreted as technically <br />' effective, but costly if actual vapor testing indicated that this process was not effective <br /> An evaluation of two remedial alternatives and their cost-effectiveness is required before <br /> any site can proceed to the remediation phase <br />' PHS-EHD cautions Ultramar that if conclusions in the tY required Feasibility Stud indicate <br /> q Y <br /> that an alternative remediation method is considered more cost-effective, the costs of <br />' installing the proposed multiple, dual casing vapor extraction well(s) may not be fully <br /> reimbursed and costs for the required alternate method of remediation may not be <br /> reimbursed SWRCB-CUF staff has requested that the final proposal approved by PHS- <br />' EHD be sent to them for pre-approval of costs before the field work is initiated <br /> PHS-EHD can approve the "Letter Amendment to Work Plan" once the air sparge well <br />' option and notations to the specific sections noted above are addressed satisfactorily If <br /> Ultramar chooses to waive obtaining pre-approval of costs for reimbursement, it should <br /> be noted in this amendment's revision to PHS-EHD <br /> The boring permit application, $89 permit fee, and the access agreement noted in PHS- <br /> EHD's October 13, 1997 correspondence is stili to be submitted prior to final approval of <br />' the workplan <br /> Please continue to direct your submittals to Michael Infurna, Senior REHS, and you may <br />' call him at (209) 468-3454 should you have any questions or you wish to discuss the <br /> site <br />' Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Z-1 <br />' Michael J Infuma Jr , enior REHS Margaret F_agono, REHS <br /> LOP 1 Site Mitigation Unit 1V Supervisor <br /> Ml/ <br /> c CVRWQCB - Pat Anderson <br /> c SWRCB-CUF - J DiGiorgio, PO Box 944212, Sacto , 94244-2120 <br /> c Horizon Envir- G Barker, 5011 Foothill Pkwy, #7, EI Dorado Hills, 95762 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.