Laserfiche WebLink
' Sou h pile. (approximately 100 CY) - two composites, (labeled "A" <br /> & "B" , ) were taken by digging down into the pile at selected <br /> locations and filling a clean metal tube with spoil. Each tube <br />' was then sealed and preserved as described above. <br /> Nort pile, (approximately 20 CY) -- a clean metal tube was pushed <br />' into the spoil at 3 locations to fill .it with spoil ; it was then <br /> sealed and preserved as described above. <br />' PPA X is a generalized site map of the property showing the <br /> locations of the spoil piles, clean soil, and excavation. <br /> After completion of the sampling operations, the preserved <br /> samples were transported to FGL Environmental under chain of <br /> custody by the geologist: instructions were given to analyze the <br /> soil samples for BTEX, (Method 8020 , ) & TPH-G, (Method 8015M; ) <br />' and the water sample for BTEX, (Method 602, ) and TPH-G, (Method <br /> 8015M. ) <br /> The results of the analysis of the soil samples from the excava - <br /> tion and the spoi pales is summarized on TABLE III . which shows <br /> that all tested components were below reporting limits. <br />' The results of the analysis of the water sample is listed on <br /> TABLE IVB which shows that all tested components were below <br /> reporting limits. <br />' Copies of the laboratory worksheets and chain of custody are <br /> included as EXfllBI H. <br />' After receiving the results of the laboratory analyzes from the <br /> site, and discussions with M. Lagorio of the County EHD, it was <br /> agreed that no further excavation was necessary, and that the <br /> hole could be filled with clean material and returned to its <br /> original configuration. <br />' On May 14 & 17, 1993, the site of the removed UST was filled with <br /> approximately 131 CY' s of 5/16 X 1/8 gravel; copies of the Back- <br /> fill Excavation Certificate and weightmaster tickets are attached <br /> as EXHIBIT I <br /> CONCLUSIONS: <br /> Based upon visual evidence and the results of the laboratory <br /> analyzes, all contamination has been removed from the site, and <br /> no further work is necessary. The composite water sample taken <br /> from the groundwater which had entered the excavation during the <br /> 6 <br />