My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009073
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2825
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545822
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2020 2:57:38 PM
Creation date
7/15/2020 1:29:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009073
RECORD_ID
PR0545822
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005566
FACILITY_NAME
RIVERSIDE CEMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
2825
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2825 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 1 <br /> EHD representative stopped the work, and requested additional <br /> samplling. Two (2) sail samples were taken from the northeast <br />' wall at depths of 4 ' and 7 ' by Geo-Analytical Laboratory; the <br /> upper sample was taken from the gray clay, the lower one imme- <br /> diately below it at 7 ' . Refer to Plate VII for details. <br />' Laboratory results of those samples, (Table II & Exhibit E„) <br /> revealed that BTEX, EDB, TPH-G, and total lead were all below <br /> detection limits in the sample taken at 7 ' , (Si . ) A small amount <br />' of Xylene was present in the soil sample taken at 4 ' , (S2; ) all <br /> ether components tested were below detection levels. The removed <br /> spoil was returned to the hole. <br /> After reviewing the results of the above work, the County EHD <br /> stated that site closure could not occur and that additional work <br />' would be required; refer to Exhibit F for documentation. <br /> WORKPLAN FOR SOIL INVESTIGATION: <br />' Because of the very minor amount of contamination encountered , <br /> the shallow depth and the limited area it occupies, it is felt <br /> that the best method for removing the contaminated soil is by <br /> additional excavation and sampling; the following workplan is <br /> proposed for that purpose. <br />' 1 . Using JTO equipment, excavate to the north and east of the <br /> existing site from the area where the clay layer was found. The <br /> RG on location, (WJH, ) will direct the work. <br />' 2. Excavation will continue in the direction of the clay layer <br /> until all evidence of contamination has been removed. It is <br /> anticipated that the maximum size of this work will be approx- <br /> imately 20' X 15 ' X 10 ' deep; refer to Plate VIII for the <br /> anticipated configuration of the excavation. Water was not <br /> encountered during tank removal operations at a depth of 10 feet , <br /> but may be higher at the time this work 3s performed_ In the <br /> event water is encountered, one or more "grab" samples will be <br /> taken for analysis. <br />' 3. Soil samples will be taken from the bottom and sides of the <br /> excavation approximately as shown of Plate VIII; the actual <br /> sample locations will depend on conditions encountered during the <br /> ' work , upon agreement with the County EHD representative. Soil <br /> samples will be taken from the teeth of the backhoe bucket by <br /> pushing a clean metal tube into the spoil , it will be promptly <br /> sealed, labeled and preserved on ice pending transport to a <br /> Certified lab for analysis. Depending on conditions at the site, <br /> soil samples may be taken by pushing the metal tuba directly into <br /> the in-place soil by the geologist. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.