My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008475
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
3300
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545858
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 10:22:35 PM
Creation date
7/15/2020 3:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008475
RECORD_ID
PR0545858
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003600
FACILITY_NAME
Nella Oil #427
STREET_NUMBER
3300
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3300 Waterloo Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUESTS FOR CLOSURE 2 1 MARCH 1994 <br />' CLOSURE ]DOCUMENTATION <br /> The minimum information required in the closure report includes <br /> 1 Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, <br /> industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site, ' <br /> 2 Site maps, to scale, of area unpacted showing Iocations of former <br />' and existing tank systems, elevation contours, gradients, and <br /> nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities, <br /> 3 High and low ground water Ievels (below ground surface), <br /> 4 Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses, <br />' S Vertical and lateral concentration contours of contaminants found <br /> initially, and those remaining in soil and ground water, both on <br />' and off site, <br /> 6 Mass balance calculation of the substance treated versus that <br /> remaining, <br /> 7 Technology used to clean the site, if Best Available Technology <br /> (BAT) was not used, explain why, <br /> 8 Zone of influence calculated for the subsurface remediation system <br /> and the zone of capture attained for the soil and ground water <br /> remediation system, <br /> 9 Reasons why "background" was/is unattainable using BAT, and <br /> 10 Rationale why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses J <br /> Additional information submitted, such as risk assessments or fate and transport <br /> modeling, must include the assumptions used <br />' Upon review, if Board staff determines that the Closure Report substantiates the <br /> request for closure, the remedial and monitoring activities may cease Upon <br />' concurring with the closure request, Board staff will prepare a letter which <br /> summarizes the site conditions and includes the following <br />' "Based on the information provideo, Board staff has determined rand <br /> the Local Implementing Agency concurs,] that appropriate response <br /> actions have been completed, that acceptable remedial practices were <br />' implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial <br /> or removal action, or monitoring is required at [Facility name and <br /> address] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.