Laserfiche WebLink
® }. 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> contamination identified at the project site (see examples above). <br /> • The California Water Boards Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program indicate <br /> that this parcel is a "hot spot"for DBCP contamination. The domestic drinking water well shall be <br /> tested for DBCP before final recordation of parcel map. <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> contamination identified in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: <br /> Close proximity to a former landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate <br /> groundwater impact, etc.) <br /> ® ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> contamination identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO <br /> IDENTIFIED AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR <br /> FURTHER ACTION <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section) for <br /> any real and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take <br /> into consideration the proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to <br /> recommend further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. <br /> Recommendations may include additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples) and/or <br /> mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must <br /> include a time frame for implementation. <br /> • Water samples required for DBCP <br /> ® ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive (i.e. all information referenced was included in this report—report should not <br /> reference other reports). <br /> ® ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ® ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Aaron Gooderham, EHS Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 26-02-001 Page 2 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />