My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008356
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4648
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545864
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 9:58:39 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 9:37:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008356
RECORD_ID
PR0545864
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004530
FACILITY_NAME
MARLOWE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
4648
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4648 WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i r <br /> I07 May 1999 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0104 <br /> IPage 2 of 8 <br /> with Appendix A Purged ground water was containerized in 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site <br />' in an area lacking general public access <br />' 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br />' Following well purging activities, ground water levels in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, <br /> MW-5,MW-6 and VW-I achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge Prior to ground water sample <br /> collection,an additional gallon of ground water was purged from wells MW-1,MW-3,MW-4, MW- <br /> 5, MW-6 and VW-I utilizing a teflon bailer and new rope. Ground water samples were collected <br /> from the six purged wells utilizing new,disposable polyethylene bailers The retrieved samples were <br /> transferred into four 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml preservative Care was taken <br /> I to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping Ground water <br /> sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br />' 2 3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br />' Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br />' in accordance with <br /> • EPA Method 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), <br />' • EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene <br /> BTEX) with methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), and <br />' • EPA Method 8260 for tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl <br /> ether (ETBE), tert amyl methyl ether (TAME) and MTBE <br /> 3.0. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION/IN-SITU AIR SPARGE PILOT TEST PROCEDURES <br />' On 18 March 1999,a SVE/IAS pilot test was initiated at the site by applying a vacuum at well VW-1 <br /> and infecting compressed air into well MW-6, during the SVE/IAS pilot test operation, a total of four <br />' extracted soil gas samples were collected at the Inlet of the SVE unit SVE and IAS pilot test <br /> procedures for the site were outlined in a Letter Work Plan dated 02 dune 1998 prepared by AGE <br /> Iand approved by the PHS-EHD by letter on 15 June 1998 <br /> i <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.