Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Report - January 1999 <br /> • MARLOWE PROPERTY <br /> I4648 East Waterloo Road, Stockton, California <br /> I1.0. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK <br /> I Advanced GeoEnvrronmental,Inc (AGE)has prepared this Quarterly Report for 4648 East Waterloo <br /> Road, Stockton, Califorrua The site setting is illustrated on Figure 1 Site structures and monitoring <br /> well locations are depicted on Figure 2 <br /> The objective of the work was to momtor dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in ground <br /> water and to characterize ground water flow direction and gradient on the site This report is <br /> I prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) and by the Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB) for investigation of underground storage tank (UST) sites A <br /> summary of previous investigations at the site was included in the Quarterly Report-April 1996, <br /> dated 12 June 1996, prepared by AGE <br /> I2.0. PROCEDURES <br />' On 08 January 1999, ground water monitoring was performed at wells MW-I through MW-6, <br /> ground water sampling was performed at wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6 and VW-I Ground water <br />' monitoring and sampling procedures for the site were outlined in the Monitoring Well Installation <br /> Work Plan -August 1996, dated 23 August 1996 prepared by AGE and approved by the PHS-EHD <br /> by letter dated i I October 1996 <br /> I <br /> 21 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> I Depths to ground water were measured in each well from the casco tops of the well s at the site to <br /> g <br /> the nearest 0 01 foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter Ground water elevations in each well at <br /> Ithe site were calculated by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from surveyed casing <br /> elevations (Table 1) Ground water elevations were plotted and contoured on a scaled site map <br /> (Figure 3) <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately 10 to 24 gallons of ground water (a minimum of <br /> I three well-volumes per well) were removed from wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6 and VW-1 utilizing <br /> a two-stage submersible pump, the first two gallons of purged ground water from MW-1, MW-5, <br /> MW-6 and VW-1 were removed utilizing a teflon bailer and new rope Temperature, pH and <br /> I conductivity were measured for stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals from each well using <br /> an ICM Model 52200 water analyzer Field data and logs are included with Appendix A Purged <br /> ground water was containerized in 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site in an area lacking general <br /> I <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />