Laserfiche WebLink
' 28 April 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0103 <br /> Page 3 of i l <br />' 0 5 gallon Purge water was placed in 55-gallon drums and stored on-site Stabilization data are <br /> included in Appendix. A <br />' A water sample was collected from each .yell using a new disposable plastic bailer Each sample <br /> was collected in four 40-m1 VOA-vials presened with hydrochloric acrd, placed in a chilled <br /> container and transported to a state-certified laboratory <br />' 32 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND 1VATER SAMPLES <br /> The Nvater samples were transported under chain-of-custody to Alpha Analytical Laboratories <br />' (AAL) in Ukiah for analysis The water samples i.+ere analyzed for TPH-g, BTE&X and <br /> halogenated volatile organics in accordance mth EPA methods 8015, 602 and 601, respectsely <br />' TPH-g was detected in MW-1 and 1.111'-2 at concentrations of S60 pgil (parts per billion ppb) <br /> and 62 ppb respects ely Benzene was detected in MW-2, M1V-3 and MW-4 at concentrations of <br /> 0 65 ppb, 0 67 ppb and 0 64 ppb, respects\ely Toluene was detected in NNW-2 at a concentration <br />' of 0 72 ppm Ethylbenzene and xylenes N\ere not detected in any of the water samples The <br /> anal tical results are summai ized in Table 3 The laboratory report and chain-of-custody are <br /> included in Appends\ B <br /> Se\eral halogenated \olatile organic compounds N\ere detected in each «ell including <br /> 1,1-Dichloi oethane 1,2-Dichloroethane, Ti iehloroeth\1ene and 1,1-DichloroetliN leve The <br /> laborator) report for the halogenated hydi ocai bons is included in appendrr B <br /> 3 3 GROUND WATER CONDITIO\`S <br /> At the time of monitoirng, the depth to ground \pater at the site was apprommately 78 feet Since <br /> Apr sl 1994, ground water depth has risen an aN erage of 1 43 feet at the site This is consistent <br /> with a regional rise in ground water between 1994 and 1995 Well casing elevations and ground <br /> water depth data are summarized on Table 1 <br /> The hydr aiilrc gi adient calculated from the 27 January 1995 measurements is 0 013 ft/ft, oriented <br /> S 60 E (Figure 3) This gradient is slightly steeper than the previous gradient (0 0071 ft/ft, April <br /> 1994) <br /> iIn October 1993 and January 1994, MW-3 was the dawn-gradient well However, the ground <br /> water flow dii ection has since changed to the southeast, resulting in MW-4 as the down-gradient <br /> well Historically, the flow direction at the site has varied from northeast to southeast It is <br /> uncertain whether the shift in ground water flow direction is the result of seasonal changes or <br /> localized agricultural or domestic water well pumping <br />