My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008416
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4648
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545864
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 9:59:53 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 9:48:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008416
RECORD_ID
PR0545864
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004530
FACILITY_NAME
MARLOWE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
4648
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4648 WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 June 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 95-0104 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> borings and in ground water samples collected from MW-1 Between 1988 and 1992, this well <br /> became dry due to a declining water table <br />' Between December 1992 and September 1993,three additional monitoring wells(MW-2,MW-3 and <br /> MW-4)were installed at the site Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in soil samples collected <br />' during installation of the additional wells However, bromomethane was detected in one soil sample <br /> collected from MW-4 Installation and sampling procedures, and the results of laboratory analysis <br /> were included in the Quarterly Report - October 1993 prepared by Geological Audit Services, Inc <br />' On 04 April 1995, one vapor extraction well (VW-1)was installed at the site near the center position <br /> of the former UST Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected during well <br />' installation at concentrations as high as 14,000 parts per million (ppm) Subsequently, AGE <br /> performed a soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test in March 1995 to evaluate remedial options for <br /> the site Details of the SVE pilot test, as well as recommendations for soil and ground water <br />' remediation, were included ;n the Corrective Action Plan dated 28 April 1995, prepared by AGE <br /> 3.0 PROCEDURES <br /> 3 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br />' On 24 April 1996 the depth to round water in each monitoring well was measured to the nearest <br /> P � P g b <br /> 0 01 foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter Relative ground water elevations were calculated by <br /> subtracting the depth to ground water from the relative casing elevations surveyed from a temporary <br /> benchmark (Table 1-Relative Ground Water Elevations) Relative ground water elevations were <br />' plotted and contoured on a scaled site map, from which the ground water gradient was estimated <br /> (Figure 3- Relative Ground Water Elevation A1ap) <br />' After water levels were measured, a minimum of three well volumes of ground water were purged <br /> from each well using a Grundfos Redi-Flo II submersible pump Between 7 5 and 15 gallons of <br /> water were removed from MWA and VW-1,between 75 and 90 gallons of water were removed from <br />' wells MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured at regular intervals from each well using an ICM <br />' model 52200 water analyzer Stabilization data and field logs are in Appendix A Purged ground <br /> water was stored in 55-gallon drums on-site in an area inaccessible to the general public <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.