My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
222
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545869
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 10:37:04 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 10:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545869
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003764
FACILITY_NAME
SJ COUNTY COURT HOUSE
STREET_NUMBER
222
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14916001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
222 E WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS (1Q07) <br /> On March 1, 2007, to comply with quarterly groundwater monitoring requirements, and to monitor <br /> the plume of impacted groundwater, Ramage Environmental monitored and sampled the three <br /> wells. <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Depth-to-groundwater was monitored to within 0.01-foot using a water level indicator. The static <br /> depth to the groundwater table, as measured in the three monitoring wells, ranged from 11.90 feet <br /> below grade in MW-1 to 24.11 feet below street grade in MW-3. The groundwater surface <br /> ti.. elevation in the three wells ranged from a high of 11.76 feet below mean sea level (msl) at MW-1 <br /> to a low of 12.55 feet below msl at MW-3. The resulting groundwater surface appears as a <br /> regular plane dipping to the northeast at a gradient of approximately 0.0094 foot/foot. A <br /> groundwater surface contour map is included as Figure 4, the groundwater monitoring data are <br /> summarized in Table 3, and the sample information field sheets are included in Appendix A. <br /> Between December 13, 2006 and March 1, 2007, the groundwater surface rose an average of <br /> 0.12 feet, the groundwater gradient decreased from 0.0098 to 0.0094 foot/foot, and the <br /> `P4 groundwater flow direction remained toward the northeast. These groundwater surface <br /> characteristics are consistent with historical and seasonal trends. <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following groundwater level measurements, the wells were purged and sampled. The wells were <br /> purged with a pump and dedicated disposable tubing until at least three well casing volumes had <br /> been removed and/or after groundwater temperature, pH and electrical conductivity values had <br /> stabilized. Groundwater was sampled from the wells using disposable polyethylene bailers and <br /> laboratory-supplied containers. Each sample container was transported in an iced cooler with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation to Excelchem Environmental Labs (Excelchem), a state of <br /> California certified hazardous waste testing laboratory (Certification #2119). <br /> Excelchem analyzed each groundwater sample for TPH-as-gasoline and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8021 B/8015M, and for MTBE, di-isopropyl ether <br /> `F (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETRE), tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), <br /> 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) by EPA Method 82606. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.