My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PR0535342
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
29425
>
4700 - Waste Tire Program
>
PR0535342
>
PR0535342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2020 5:32:38 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 8:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4700 - Waste Tire Program
RECORD_ID
PR0535342
PE
4740
FACILITY_ID
FA0020390
FACILITY_NAME
RENEWED RESOURCES CORP
STREET_NUMBER
29425
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25312026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
29425 S MACARTHUR RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10992
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15,000 cubic yards of burn ash would have to be temporary relocated. The pyrolytic oil could <br /> then be excavated from the bottom of the canyon. Next both of the 180-foot slopes would <br /> have to be cut back from a 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) to at least 3:1 above the stains to <br /> safely excavate the material, or extensive shoring would be required in accordance with Title <br /> 8, California Code or Regulation, Section 1541, et seq. <br /> 3.3 Field Modifications <br /> 3.3.1 Clay Plug Design <br /> After reviewing the condition of the stain with the CH2M HILL site engineer, U.S. EPA on- <br /> scene representative, and Sukut Construction, the CIWMB engineer decided to place a"clay <br /> plug" throughout the stained area and a 60-mil co-extruded textured HDPE geomembrane <br /> over the clay fill. This option was the best available alternative considering the weather <br /> limitations, expenditure limits, technical reasons (e.g., slope stability, excavation limits, <br /> shoring requirements, and slope steepness), and that free product (oil) was no longer flowing <br /> from the stained areas. <br /> The CIWMB engineer first proposed placing granular material in a 2-foot by 2-foot trench at <br /> the bottom of the canyon and a composite geonet underdrain at the stained areas along the <br /> slope to drain the pyrolytic oil from the gravel lenses. A 60-mil co-extruded textured HDPE <br /> geomembrane would then cover the drainage layer. The cover (i.e., foundation, barrier, and <br /> vegetation layers) would be placed on top of the geomembrane. A 4-foot, Schedule 40 stain- <br /> less steel, slotted well casing would extend from a gravel pack at the low point of the drain- <br /> age system. However, with 2 days of continued excavation, the pyrolytic oil did not show <br /> signs of further seepage. Investigations showed only lighter stained material remained. <br /> After discussing the changes in the pyrolytic oil condition, the CIWMB engineer removed the <br /> granular drainage material and the Schedule 40 stainless steel well casing and replaced the <br /> first design with 4 to 5 feet of clay compacted to 90 percent modified compaction. The clay <br /> plug was placed to prevent the oil from migrating further down canyon. <br /> Unfortunately, the spillway elevation and resulting water level reached the clay plug, and, in <br /> the worst case scenario, the water level would be 2 to 5 feet above the oil stain. To mitigate <br /> this condition, the CIWMB engineer elected to place the 60-mil geomembrane over the clay <br /> plug. The geomembrane was placed into anchor trenches above and below the clay plug. A 2- <br /> foot barrier layer and a 1-foot vegetation layer covered the geomembrane. The geomembrane <br /> will prevent water from saturating the clay plug and allow the oil to migrate into the retention <br /> basin. Figure 7 shows the toe design. <br /> 3.3.2 Cover Design <br /> After discussions with the Central Valley RWQCB representative, the cap design was <br /> changed to incorporate evapotranspiration cover concepts. Originally, the cover design <br /> allowed for one V-ditch through the center of the canyon. Because the site statistically <br /> received fewer than 10 inches of rain per year, the upper fill area of the cover was designed to <br /> have 1 to 2 percent grade at the center to create a crown. Drainage was directed to two <br /> CIWMB 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.