My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PR0535342
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
29425
>
4700 - Waste Tire Program
>
PR0535342
>
PR0535342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2020 5:32:38 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 8:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4700 - Waste Tire Program
RECORD_ID
PR0535342
PE
4740
FACILITY_ID
FA0020390
FACILITY_NAME
RENEWED RESOURCES CORP
STREET_NUMBER
29425
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25312026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
29425 S MACARTHUR RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10992
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LFR Levine-Fricke <br /> assessment will provide an overall summary of data quality, defining acceptability or <br /> problems with accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and representativeness of the results with <br /> clear guidance to the data users (e.g., risk assessors) of the uncertainties in the data that <br /> have been qualified as estimated (J) and a quantification of these uncertainties (e.g., bias <br /> high by a maximum of 80%) wherever possible. <br /> A1.3.3 Data Qualifiers <br /> During validation and assessment procedures, data results will be flagged with U.S. EPA <br /> CLP data qualifiers based upon QC criteria and best professional judgment. <br /> A1.4 Quality Control Review <br /> During data validation and assessment, results for QC sample analyses, including blanks, <br /> spikes, and duplicates will be evaluated as described below, using the Precision, <br /> Accuracy, Reproducibility, Comparability, and Completeness (PARCC; U.S. EPA <br /> 1994c) QC criteria defined below, to determine the validity and usability of the data. <br /> A1.4.1 Accuracy <br /> The determination of accuracy of a measurement requires knowledge of the true or <br /> accepted value for the signal being measured. It is a statistical measurement of <br /> correctness, and includes components of random error (variability due to imprecision) <br /> and systematic error (bias). It therefore reflects the total error associated with a <br /> measurement. Errors as they pertain to accuracy may result from several sources <br /> including the sampling processes, field contamination, improper preservation, handling <br /> of samples, sample matrix biases, and analytical procedures. A measurement is accurate <br /> when the reported value does not differ from the true value, or known concentration of <br /> the spike or standard. Accuracy will be calculated in terms of percent recovery of a <br /> known amount of a spiked compound according to the following formula: <br /> %R = [(Cs-Cn)/Csa]x 100 <br /> Where: <br /> %R: percent recovery <br /> Cs:measured concentration in spiked aliquot <br /> Cn: measured concentration in unspiked aliquot <br /> Csa:actual concentration of spike added <br /> Accuracy will be evaluated based upon percent recoveries of the internal standards, <br /> matrix MSs, MSDs, system monitoring compounds, and surrogates for VOC analyses. <br /> The following are specific guidelines for the usability assessment of QC results that give <br /> an indication of the accuracy of the sample data. <br /> Page 4 Tracy-quly-samp-rpt-wrkpin(finap:JEE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.