Laserfiche WebLink
and some of the taller debris may serve as perches for birds of prey. Aside from the debris, burn <br /> pile areas, and compacted gravel roads leading throughout the Site, remaining open areas of the <br /> Site may be considered functional habitat with the potential to support the wildlife discussed in the <br /> following text. <br /> Analysis of Potential Impacts: <br /> Describe to what extent project activities would: <br /> a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any <br /> species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional <br /> plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. <br /> Fish and Wildlife Service. <br /> The proposed project activities may have the potential to affect listed or sensitive plant <br /> and/or wildlife species that occur in or near the excavation sites. Several wildlife species, <br /> such as migratory birds and predatory mammals, may use the area for temporary <br /> activities such as foraging, roosting, and breeding. In addition, the area may serve as a <br /> corridor to several nearby water sources (Corral Hollow Creek, Delta Mendota Canal, and <br /> the California Aqueduct). Other wildlife species, such as small burrowing mammals, may <br /> be permanent residents adjacent to or near excavation areas. <br /> Plant and wildlife species of federal and state concern that have the potential to occur in <br /> or near the project site were identified. The identities are based on a review of the <br /> following: the California Department of Fish and Game's (CDFG) California Natural <br /> Diversity Database search of the Tracy, California USGS Quadrangle (CNDDB; CDFG <br /> 2002); the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)document"Federal Endangered and <br /> Threatened Species that may be Affected by Projects in the Tracy 7 %: Minute Quad <br /> (USFWS January 22, 2003); and field surveys and informal consultation with agency <br /> representatives conducted by LFR biologists. <br /> Methodology. The above document review identified 3 special status plant species and <br /> 58 special status animal species that could occur within the Tracy, California Quadrangle. <br /> LFR biologists conducted informal field surveys on January 31 and March 20, 2003, to <br /> determine habitat value and existing conditions on site, and to look for physical evidence <br /> of plant or wildlife species of concern. The methodology of the January 31 informal field <br /> survey included walking transects of the Site approximately 50 to 100 feet apart affording <br /> 100% visibility. On March 20, 2003, LFR biologists met with the remediation contractors <br /> regarding the set-up of a staging area and for consultation on initial removal of large, <br /> above-ground debris. LFR biologists walked a large portion of the Site on March 20 <br /> looking for sign of wildlife, including any nests that might have been built in debris. In <br /> addition, LFR biologists gave a"tailgate-training"to site personnel including information <br /> on special status species that might be present in the area; the talk focused on the San <br /> Joaquin kit fox and included avoidance measures (i.e. looking in culverts or other partially <br /> enclosed spaces for kit fox before removal)for protection of the kit fox. Habitat <br /> requirements of special status species were then matched with existing habitat on site <br /> and a review of the CDFG's CNDDB document. If a species' habitat requirements <br /> matched the available habitat at the Site, and there was a recent reported occurrence of <br /> the species in the CNDDB, the species received a rating of"moderate to high"or"high" <br /> Potential to Occur in the Project Site. A"recent" report is discretionary; for example, a <br /> small burrowing mammal might be less likely to be reported, thus a report in the vicinity <br /> from 1991 would be noticeable,where a plant last reported in the 1930's and reported as <br /> "extirpated"would not be presumed to be likely to occur on site. <br /> Regulatory protection/survey requirements. Based on the evidence described in <br /> preceding text, the level of federal and state regulatory protection provided to specific <br /> 14 <br />