Laserfiche WebLink
s . <br /> Law Offices of Patrick D. Riddle <br /> Patrick D. Riddle 7574 Shoreline Drive <br /> David R. Isola Stockton, California 95219 <br /> Michael L. F. Buck Telephone: (209) 952-6262 <br /> Attorneys at Law Fax: (209) 952-2331 <br /> June 28, 1994 <br /> VIA TELECOPIER/U.S. MAIL <br /> yovyXD <br /> Richard M. Archbold, Esq. JUL 0 11994 <br /> NEUMILLER & BEARDSLEE <br /> 509 West Weber Avenue, 5th Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95203 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Re: Roek Brothers Site <br /> Our Client: Ted and Dena Knowles <br /> Dear Mr. Archbold: <br /> Thank you for your correspondence of June 24, 1994, which we <br /> received on June 27, 1994 . While we look forward to tomorrow's <br /> meeting, and sincerely hope some of the pending issues between our <br /> respective clients can be resolved, we are compelled to respond to <br /> various inaccuracies and accusations contained in your last letter. <br /> Our first disagreement with your letter relates to the chronology <br /> of communications between our offices. <br /> The first contact with our clients and our office was by <br /> correspondence dated January 29, 1990 from Daniel Schroeder of <br /> Neumiller & Beardslee directed to Harold Knowles. We responded to <br /> that letter first by a telephone call to Mr. Schroeder, followed by <br /> a letter dated February 5, 1990, wherein we advised that the <br /> Knowles never experienced any contamination-related problems during <br /> their ownership of the property, and that the tanks were still in <br /> place after the property was sold to Pepsi. On March 2, 1990, this <br /> office responded to a written request for information sent by Mr. <br /> Schroeder on February 16, 1990, by providing him with the precise <br /> information he requested. <br /> In July, 1990, after ' not hearing from your office for over five <br /> months, we wrote to Mr. Schroeder advising him that we considered <br /> the matter concluded as to our clients, and that we would proceed <br /> to close our file. The next correspondence we received from your <br /> office was dated May 22 , 1993 , yes, over three (3) years following <br /> the last contact. <br />