My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 10:55:41 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GROUND ZERO ANWSIS,INC. • <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon,California 95320-1927 <br /> Telephone: (209)838-9888 <br /> Facsimile:(209)838-9883 <br /> September 17, 1999AIVE® <br /> f, <br /> MAR 0 6 2000 <br /> Mr. Ron Rowe ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave., 3d Floor. <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Subject: Workplan for Remedial Effectiveness/Case Closure Evaluation <br /> Knowles/Roek Property, 102 South Wilson Way, Stockton, CA (Figure 1) <br /> Dear Mr. Rowe: <br /> As per your August 23, 1999 comments in response to Ground Zero Analysis' Second <br /> Quarter 1999 Status Report (dated July 27, 1999) we are submitting this workplan for a <br /> remedial effectiveness/case closure evaluation. The proposed work is intended to evaluate <br /> the effectiveness of active and natural remedial processes to date, the cost effectiveness of <br /> continued active remediation, the fate of residual contamination under natural attenuation <br /> processes and the impact to human health and the environment from residual <br /> contamination. We are proposing this work based upon the following observations: <br /> Source Material Removal by Soil Vapor Extraction is No Longer Cost Effective <br /> Our data suggest that approximate 50% of the estimated mass of soil contaminants prior <br /> to instituting vapor extraction has since been removed. The remaining 50% is comprised <br /> ofor the most part of contaminated soil which is currently submerged due to high water <br /> levels. Water levels are not expected to decrease in the near future. Influent vapor <br /> o� concentrations to the VES have become asymptotic at relatively low levels (Figure 2). <br /> The cost per unit of contaminant mass removed from the subsurface has stabilized at a <br /> high value(Figure 3). <br /> Plume Stability <br /> Cumulative groundwater sampling data indicate that the plume of dissolved hydrocarbon <br /> (o e� contamination is stable. The exception is the increasing concentrations of dissolved <br /> gasoline and MTBE beneath the southern portion of the property. As discussed in the <br /> Second Quarter 1999 status report, the source of this encroaching contamination is offsite <br /> U9 <br /> ro k\c1mum%domp.dw <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.