My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 10:55:41 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC. <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon,California 95320 <br /> Telephone: (209)838-9888 <br /> Facsimile: (209)838-9883 w <br /> June 27, 2000 <br /> N '— <br /> N <br /> Mr. Ron Rowe <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave., P Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Subject: Addendum to Workplan for Confirmation Borings and Remedial <br /> Effectiveness Evaluation-Knowles/Roek Property, 102 South Wilson Way, <br /> Stockton, CA(Figure 1) <br /> Dear Mr. Rowe: <br /> • As requested in your April 10, 2000 letter commenting on Ground Zero's Workplan for <br /> Remedial Effectiveness/Case Closure Evaluation (dated September 17, 1999) we are <br /> submitting this addendum to the workplan. The proposed work is intended evaluate the <br /> effectiveness of remediation to date, the cost effectiveness of continued active <br /> remediation, the fate of residual contamination under natural processes and the potential <br /> impact to human health and the environment from residual contamination. In addition, in <br /> accordance with your directive, the work is intended to further define the extent of <br /> contamination and identify preferential flowpaths, if any. We are proposing this work <br /> based upon the following observations: <br /> Source Material Removal by Soil Vapor Extraction is No Longer Cost Effective <br /> Our data suggest that approximate 50% of the estimated mass of soil contaminants prior <br /> to instituting vapor extraction has since been removed. The remaining 50% is comprised <br /> for the most part of contaminated soil which is currently submerged due to high water <br /> levels. Water levels are not expected to decrease in the near future. As of December, <br /> 1999, influent vapor concentrations to the VES had become asymptotic at relatively low <br /> levels while he cost per unit of contaminant mass removed from the subsurface had <br /> stabilized at a high value. <br /> • <br /> rmk\cbsum\addendum <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.