Laserfiche WebLink
• • Mr. Ron Rowe <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> • The criteria for proposing additional groundwater monitoring wells will be the <br /> identification of significant lithological units that are not adequately monitored by the <br /> currently existing wells. This may included discrete intervals of higher permeability. <br /> Other than proposed monitoring well MW14, described below, no additional monitoring <br /> wells are currently proposed simply in order to screen the current water table surface. <br /> Existing monitoring wells MWI, MW2, MW3 and MW13 are currently screened at or just <br /> below the water table. Vapor wells VW2, VW3, VW5 and VW6 are also screened across <br /> the water table surface. Together these provide more than adequate onsite monitoring <br /> density. However, it may be advisable in the future to install additional water table wells <br /> downgradient of the site. This issue will be addressed following evaluation of the data <br /> obtained from the proposed phase of work. <br /> One monitoring well (MW14) will be installed at the approximate location depicted on <br /> Figure 2. The purpose of this well is to investigate groundwater conditions in the <br /> indicated preferential flowpath (sand channel) present along the southern portion of the <br /> subject site (Figure 3). Well MW14 will be drilled using hollow stem auger equipment and <br /> will be constructed of 2 inch diameter PVC and screened from approximately 30 to 55 feet <br /> bgs. <br /> • We disagree that monitoring well MW13 provides a conduit for vertical migration of <br /> contaminants and should be replaced. The base of the screened interval in this well (75 <br /> feet) is similar to that in most of the other wells on the project, including MW8. The only <br /> difference is that the screen in MW13 extends up to 20 feet. Groundwater in the lower <br /> strata has been contaminated for years, while the upper screened strata in MW 13 <br /> contained no detectable soil contamination when the well was installed. In recent years <br /> contaminated groundwater has risen into the upper strata. MW13 was installed under <br /> permit and the screened interval was acceptable to the PHS/EHD. We do not recommend <br /> replacement of this well. <br /> TASK 4 UPDATED CONTAMINANT MASS AND DISTRIBUTION <br /> ESTIMATES, FATE AND TRANSPORT MODELING AND RISK <br /> EVALUATION <br /> Utilizing data obtained from the proposed investigation, Ground Zero will estimate the <br /> current mass and distribution of contaminants in the subsurface. If appropriate, we will <br /> also model and evaluate the fate and transport of contaminants and the action of natural <br /> attenuation. The evaluation will include estimates of cleanup time by natural attenuation <br /> alone and conjunction with continued active remediation. A Risk Evaluation will be <br /> prepared which will identify exposure pathways and potential sensitive receptors and <br /> quantify health risks due to contamination at present concentrations. The evaluation will <br /> . be used to assist in establishing site-specific soil and groundwater cleanup goals which are <br /> protective of human health and the environment. <br /> mek\c]mure\addmdum <br />