Laserfiche WebLink
A Solid Track Record in the Scientific Verification of Product Performance <br /> Defining the Science of Using Slow Release Compounds <br /> in the last five years,the use of ORC has dearly evolved from being an exploratory method to becoming a fully recognized <br /> technology.To date over 5,000 ORC applications have been made in every state and in over a dozen countries.This pro- <br /> gression has been dearly marked by a solid record of publications,by Regenesis and its customers, in the peer review litera- <br /> ture,at numerous technical conferences and in the trade literature.Almost 200 citations are now documented and the full list <br /> along with some of publications themselves can be reviewed on our web site at www.regenesis.com. Most recently, a com- <br /> pendium of 39 papers have been published(`Accelerated Bioremediation Using Slow Release Compounds' representing all <br /> the papers that were presented at the hill series of the world renown Battelle Bioremediation Conferences since 1993.A copy <br /> is available from Regenesa that also contains an engineering manual for ORC treatment design and installation. <br /> Cost Comparison <br /> By accelerating natural attenuation ORC applications can be more cost-effective than other alternative technologies and <br /> can inexpensively restore contaminated properties to market value.Treatment with ORC is typically: <br /> e 1/4 to 1/2 the cost of air sparging with vapor containment <br /> • equal to or less than the cost of excavation, hauling and disposal <br /> of residual hydrocarbons from the floor of the UST excavation <br /> • less than long-term monitoring costs of unassisted natural attenuation sites <br /> • 1/4 the cost of pump and treat system <br /> Compared with Air Sparging plus Vapor Containment <br /> An ORC application is typically much more cost effective than air sparging with vapor containment <br /> The following includes a summary of costs comparing ORC to air sparging systems on various sites': <br /> Site AS!SVE ORC Savings % Savings <br /> Oklahoma S158,000 546,000 $112,000 70% <br /> California 180,000 80,000 100,000 55% <br /> Alabama 99,000 26,000 73,000 74% <br /> 'All values were derived independently by the sits/consultants.The costs are full systems costs with the objective of site closure. <br /> Compared with Natural Attenuation (Monitoring Only) <br /> ORC treatments, if properly applied,can result in site closure in as little as one year.This can also <br /> be more cost effective than only monitoring the site and relying on unassisted natural attenuation.Applying ORC <br /> can restore property to market value and avoid long term monitoring costs as well as potential future liability': <br /> Site Monitor Only ORC Savings %Savings <br /> Oklahoma $54,000 $46,000 S 8,000 15% <br /> Alabama 54,000 26,000 28,000 52% <br /> 'All.loss were derived independently by the sites'consultants. <br /> t..'. <br /> REGENESIS <br /> 1011 Calle Sombre • San Clemente • California 92673 <br /> Tel: 969.366.8000. v Fax: 969.366.8090. • e-mail:orearegenesis.com w www.regenesis.com <br />