My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012175
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 12:17:07 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 11:23:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012175
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4) Legal and Institutional Factors <br /> The feasibility of each technology was assessed with consideration to site-specific <br /> conditions. Technologies which are able to treat or control the contamination, but are <br /> not suitable for the site were eliminated <br /> r The maturity of the technologies was considered, with preference given to technologies <br /> with a track record of successful implementation Constraints imposed by the <br /> technology were considered, and technologies with constraints which were too limiting <br /> were eliminated The achievable levels of cleanup were a major factor a technology <br /> with a known achievable level of cleanup was given preference over one with a less <br /> certain achievable level of cleanup <br /> Without compromising other criteria, adequate protection of public health and the <br /> environment is to be maintained during and after the remediation process Preference <br /> was given to technologies which achieved the desired cleanup levels without increasing <br /> the risk to the environment <br /> The selected technologies were screened for their compliance with applicable <br /> regulations. The screening also accounted for the acceptability of the technology to the <br /> local community <br /> Selection Remedial Techn l i A range of remedial action technologies is <br /> available to control, remove, treat, or dispose contaminated groundwater at 102 S <br /> Wilson Way, Stockton These technologies include those which have been applied at <br /> hazardous waste cleanup sites, as well as those which are currently unproven or limited <br /> in application. <br /> The technologies are presented in those suitable for groundwater remediation The <br /> technologies are grouped according to the general remedial approach, with several <br /> technologies being suggested for each group Remediating contaminated soil has <br /> already been discussed in Sections 3 2 1 and 3 2 3 Table 3-3 lists the general remedial <br /> approaches together with the associated technologies for remediating groundwater A <br /> brief discussion of each technology, together with its advantages and disadvantages of <br /> limitations, is presented in Table 3-4 This summary presents sufficient information <br /> for a preliminary assessment of the technologies Wherever obvious disadvantages <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.