My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012198
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 12:16:51 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 11:33:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012198
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIvEo <br /> laboratories DEC 0 7 2900 <br /> --- <br /> December 7,2400 <br /> Ground Zero Analysis <br /> Attn Greg Stahl <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon, CA 95320 <br /> Subject Knowles Roek Protect <br /> ' EDB Report on sample KR VW-1 <br /> ' Dear Mr Stahl <br /> This laboratory analyzed samples for the above mentioned project back on 12/04/00 One of the analysis involved was <br /> Oxygenates by method 821011 After the analysis of the samples and data review, the EDB result of 1,200 ug1L on sample <br /> KR VW-1 caught my attention,not only because of the high concentration,but because I rarely have seen this compound <br /> detected before Because of that, it prompted me to investigate prior analyses of that same sample that have been performed <br /> at our facility After reviewing the analytical data from the August,2000 sampling event of this same project, I found that EDB <br /> ' was detected on that same sample(well)at a concentration of 490 uglL However,when the report was generated, it was <br /> incorrectly reported as ND(not detected)at an elevated reporting limit due to dilution factors Apparently we made an <br /> interpretation mistake at the time the data was reviewed and consequently reported <br /> I apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused We would like to assure you that we are taking steps to make <br /> sure that a mistake like that does not happen again If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at <br /> (209)581-9280 <br /> i <br /> Sincerely, <br /> i <br /> Hiram ueto <br /> ' Lab Director <br /> Argon Labs <br /> ' 3037 Fpkh St, Ceres, CA 95307 • Phone (209) 581-9480 • Fax (209) 581-9282 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.