Laserfiche WebLink
to be functioning normally since then Field data sheets presenting field parameters collected between <br /> October 11, 2004 and December 23, 2004 are included in Appendix A Certified analytical reports with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix C Analytical data were submitted to the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board as required by AB2886 The electronic delivery receipt is attached in <br /> Appendix C <br /> Ozone Iniection Monitoring Plan <br /> Monitoring wells MW-3 through MW-10 are used as observation wells to monitor the performance of the <br /> ozone infection system Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 are used as background wells to evaluate and <br /> monitor for natural geo-chemical changes in the groundwater <br /> During the fourth quarter 2004, field parameters were collected on a monthly basis and select laboratory <br /> parameters were collected on a quarterly basis During the fourth quarter 2004 monitoring event, all <br /> samples were collected after purging three volumes of well casing The modified ozone infection <br /> monitoring plan is listed below and a summary of frequency and significance of field and laboratory <br /> parameters is presented in Table 3 <br /> Field Parameters (Monthly) pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), and Specific Conductivity <br /> Laboratory Parameters (Quarterly) GRO, BTEX, five oxygenates, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), <br /> Ferrous Iron, Total Iron, and Heterotrophic Plate Count <br /> Laboratory Parameters (Annually) Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Nitrates, Sulfates, Phosphates, and Total <br /> Dissolved Solids <br /> Results <br /> Results of field and analytical parameters collected to date to evaluate and optimize the performance of <br /> the ozone infection system are presented in Tables 4 and 5 The GRO, benzene, and MTBE <br /> concentrations observed in all the groundwater monitoring wells during the fourth quarter 2004 are <br /> presented in Figure 4 Change in DO concentrations for select observation and background monitoring <br /> wells are presented in Figure 5 The historical GRO, benzene, and MTBE concentration variation over <br /> time at select monitoring wells (MW-4 through MW-8) are illustrated graphically in Figures 6 through 10 <br /> During the fourth quarter 2004, GRO concentrations appeared to have generally decreased in all the <br /> monitoring wells with the greatest decrease observed in well MW-4 (from 32,000 pg/L to 13,000 pg/L) <br /> GRO was also reported in wells MW-5, MW-6, and MW-8 at concentrations of 130 µg/L, 3,000 pg/L, and <br /> 13,000 µg/L, respectively GRO was not reported in wells MW-1 through MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, and <br /> MW-10 <br /> During the fourth quarter 2004, benzene was reported in wells, MW-4 and MW-8 Benzene <br /> concentrations had remained the same (2,500 pg/L) in well MW-4, and had increased (from 420 µg/L to <br /> 1,400 jig/L) in well MW-8, since the previous sampling event (September 14, 2004) Benzene was not <br /> reported in wells MW-1 through MW-3, MW-5 through MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 <br /> During the fourth quarter 2004, MTBE concentrations appear to have decreased in wells MW-4, MW-5, <br /> MW-6, MW-9, and MW-10, while concentrations appear to have increased in wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, <br /> and MW-8 The greatest decrease in MTBE (from 12,000 µg/L to 7,700 µg/L) was observed in well MW-6, <br /> while the greatest increase (from 20,000 pg/L to 23,000 µg/L) was observed in well MW-8 MTBE was not <br /> reported in wells MW-2 and MW-9 <br /> 1,2-DCA was reported in wells MW-7 (1 7 pg/L) and in well MW-9 (2 7 pg/L) DIPE, TSA, ETBE, TAME, <br /> EDB, or ethanol were not reported in any of the wells Analytical data were submitted to the State Water <br /> K\Bp-Arco for URS\5469\QuarterlyUO041Arco_5469_4Q04 doe 0rRAW5 <br />