Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> TABLE 5 <br /> Analytical Parameter Summary <br /> i <br /> ARCO Service Station No 5469 <br /> 130 South Wilson Way,Stockton,California <br /> Distance to Ferrous Total Heterotrophic Nitrate Sulfate Sulfite Phosphate <br /> Well nearest COD' DO' OAP3 iron 4 iron 5 plate count 6 TOC 7 as NO3 8 as SO4 a aS SOs g (Ortho)as P a TDS I l <br /> Number Date liniectionwell EEL m m m CFLI/ml m m m m m <br /> m <br /> NOTES <br /> COD was analyzed using EPA Method 410 4 µgel =micrograms per liter QA/QC Review <br /> Dissolved oxygen(DO)was analyzed using EPA Method 360 1 NA=Not analyzed <br /> A=Data accepted without qualtficatton <br /> Oxidation reduction potential(ORP)was analyzed using ASTM D 1498-76 <br /> = <br /> `Fares iron was analyzed using ] Data accepted with qualificationg Hach Method 814fi NS—Not sampled <br /> R=Data rejected <br /> Total Iron was analyzed using EPA Method 200 7 NP=Not Purged <br /> e Heterotrophic plate count was conducted using SM 9215 B < <br /> 7 Total orgamc carbon was analyzed using EPA Method 415 I =Below detection limit for the analytical methods used <br /> s Nitrite,nitrate,sulfates and phosphates were analyzed using EPA Method 300 0 <br /> Sulfite was analyzed using EPA Method 377 1 <br /> 10 Total alkalinity was analyzed using SM 2320B <br /> Total solids were analyzed using EPA Method 160 1 <br /> [l]The sample was analyzed beyond the EPA recommended holding time <br /> ]2]The incubation was performed at 35 degrees C for 48 hours with plate count agar <br /> ]3]The sample was received beyond the EPA recommended holding time <br /> [41 This sample was analyzed beyond the EPA recommend hold tune(8 hrs) The sample was kept on ice at 5 degrees C and analyzed within 24 hours of sample collection <br /> [51 This sample was prepared outside the 8 hour recommended holding time for this analysts <br /> [61 Sample result may be biased high Maine spike and matrix spike duplicate rmovenes exceed upper control limits <br /> [71 Sample result may be biased low Matrix spike duplicate recovery exceeds lower control limit Matnx spike recovery was withincontrol limits <br /> 18]Reported results may be biased low since the analyses for these analytes were performed beyond the US EPA recommended holding time <br /> ]9]The method blank contains this analyte at a concentration above the reporting limit however the concentration is less than 5%of the sample result,which is negligible according to method cntena <br /> [l0]The reporting limit for this analyte has been raised to account for matrix interference <br /> [111 The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the instrument <br /> [12]Confirmatory analysis was past EPA recommended holding time <br /> [131 This sample was originally analyzed within the EPA recommended hold time Re analysts for confirmation or dilution was performed past the recommended hold time lite result from the initial analyses are reported in the Table <br /> .141 Reported results may be biased high since the analyses for these analytes were performed beyond the US EPA recommended holding nine <br /> [15]Reported result should be considered estimated since the analyses were performed beyond the US EPA recommended holding time <br /> 1161 Reported result may be biased low as indicated by a low average percent matrix spike recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis <br /> [17]The reported result may be estimated since the analyses for these analytes were performed beyond the USEPA recommended holding time <br /> STKAr115 <br /> Amo_5469_0&M_Data <br /> 5 of 5 <br />