Laserfiche WebLink
. 2 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> On December 9, 2004, ASE measured the depth to water in all site <br /> groundwater monitoring wells, recovery wells, and piezometers using a n <br /> electric water level sounder The surface of the groundwater was also <br /> checked for the presence of free-floating hydrocarbons or sheen using a n <br /> oil/water interface probe and a product thickness bailer No free-floating <br /> hydrocarbons were observed in any of the wells Groundwater elevation <br /> data is presented as Table One <br /> Groundwater elevation (potentiometric surface) contours are plotted on <br /> Figures 2, 3 and 4 Groundwater in the shallow zone (less than 20 feet bgs) <br /> has historically shown a northern or northwestern flow This quarter, the <br /> groundwater flow direction was observed as primarily to the northwest <br /> with a gradient of between approximately 0 004 feet/foot and 0 0008 <br /> feet/foot The shallow zone potentiometric surface map is presented as <br /> Figure 2 <br /> Groundwater in the middle zone (55-70-feet bgs) flowed toward the south- <br /> southwest this quarter at a gradient of approximately 0 002 feet/foot <br /> • The groundwater flow in the deep zone (greater than 100 feet) flowed <br /> toward the south this quarter at a gradient of approximately 0 0008 <br /> feet/foot <br /> Potentiometric surface differences in wells adjacent to each other b u t <br /> screened in different zones such as monitoring wells MW-6, MW 7 a n d <br /> MW-8 show a decreasing hydraulic head with depth, suggesting t h e <br /> potential for downward groundwater flow <br /> 3 .0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> On December 9, 10 and 13, 2004, ASE attempted to collect groundwater <br /> samples from all of the groundwater monitoring wells, recovery wells, a n d <br /> the drinking water well in accordance with the RWQCB Revised Monitoring <br /> and Reporting Program, dated August 12, 2004 Monitoring wells MW-1 , <br /> MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, and recovery wells RW-1, RW-4, and RW-5 <br /> were found to either be dry, or did not contain enough water to b e <br /> sampled Groundwater samples were collected from each of the remaining <br /> wells <br /> Prior to sampling, the wells were purged of at least three well casing <br /> • volumes of groundwater using disposable polyethylene bailers The pH, <br /> Frank's One Stop Quarterly Report — December 2004 Sampling <br /> -2- <br />