My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL BOARD RESPONSE (SWRCB/OCC FILE A-1634) - 9 - <br /> PETITION <br /> 9 - <br /> PETITION FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NOS. R5-2004-0028 AND R5-2004-0029 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA WATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> to modify, Order No. R5-2004-0028 to include effluent limitations for arsenic calculated <br /> using the harmonic mean dilution credit of 222:1, and Order No. R5-2004-0029 to account <br /> for the recalculation of the effluent limitations for arsenic. <br /> The discharge of arsenic, a pollutant that produces human health effects and is a known <br /> carcinogen,was found to have a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream <br /> excursion above the Basin Plan numerical water quality objective. As such, an effluent <br /> limitation for arsenic is required and was included in Order No. R5-2004-0028. <br /> The validity and applicability of the Basin Plan numeric objective for arsenic and the use of a <br /> federal MCL as a criterion to protect water quality were previously addressed in the 19 March <br /> 2004 Response to Comments,pages 5-6 and 8-9. Please also refer to the response to the first <br /> basis, above. <br /> Regarding the request by the Discharger to utilize harmonic mean dilution, the Regional Board <br /> considered the overlapping plume with a downstream discharger, and the lack of assimilative <br /> capacity in the receiving water for arsenic. The evaluation of dilution was presented in Finding <br /> 31 of the permit and in Section 2 of the Information Sheet, and was further explained in pages 16 <br /> and 18 of the 19 March 2004 Response to Comments. <br /> The Regional Board properly adopted effluent limitations for arsenic based on the numerical <br /> water quality objective in the Basin Plan. All effluent limitations are supported by substantial <br /> evidence in the record. Please refer to permit finding 34, information sheet section 11.1, permit <br /> tables 9 and 11 and the 19 March 2004 response to comments document(pages 3 and 16-18, <br /> Item No. 4, Binder No. 1) for more information. <br /> SEVENTH BASIS: IMPROPER IMPOSITION OF EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR <br /> CYANIDE <br /> Manteca requests that the State Board modify, or order the Regional Board to modify, <br /> Order No. R5-2004-0028 to include effluent limitations for cyanide based upon NTR <br /> criteria as incorporated by the CTR and Order No. R-2004-0029 to account for the <br /> recalculation of the effluent limitations for cyanide. In addition,Manteca requests that the <br /> State Board modify, or order the Regional Board to modify, Order No. R5-2004-0028 to <br /> allow dilution for acute toxicity in its recalculation of the effluent limitations for.cyanide. <br /> The discharge of cyanide was found to have a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in- <br /> stream excursion above the Basin Plan numerical water quality objective. There is also a CTR <br /> criterion for cyanide,but consistent with the CTR, the Basin Plan objective applies, and not the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.