My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2005-CURRENT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2005-CURRENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 4:48:43 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:30:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2005-CURRENT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� s <br /> establish that the State Board intended for permit effluent limitations to play a limited role with <br /> respect to achieving compliance with the EC water quality objectives in the southern Delta. <br /> The year-round 1000 µmhos/cm EC effluent limitation in the City's permit that <br /> became effective immediately upon adoption of Order No. R5-2004-0028 is a reasonable <br /> condition that will reduce the salinity of the City's effluent and help achieve compliance with the <br /> receiving water quality objectives in the Basin Plan. The City's shift toward use of lower salinity <br /> surface water for a large portion of its water supply, as well as other source control measures, <br /> should allow the City to comply with the 1000 µmhos/cm requirement." Adoption of a cease <br /> and desist order to ensure that the City pursues the steps necessary to bring it into compliance <br /> with a 1000 µmhos/cm EC effluent limitation is also a reasonable enforcement action. The <br /> record indicates, however, that compliance with the permit effluent limitation of 700 µmhos/cm <br /> EC scheduled to become effective on April 1, 2005, could not be assured without construction <br /> and use of reverse osmosis facilities.21 Construction and operation of reverse osmosis facilities to <br /> treat discharges from the City's WQCF,prior to implementation of other measures to reduce the <br /> salt load in the southern Delta,would not be a reasonable approach.24 <br /> Without prejudging the question of possible revisions to the southern Delta EC <br /> water quality objectives, or the question of the possible conditions that may eventually be <br /> imposed on the City's permit or other permits in order to comply with water quality objectives <br /> for EC in the San Joaquin River and southern Delta, the State Board concludes that establishing <br /> zz Establishing an effluent limitation of 1000µmhos/cm is consistent with the present conditions in the Department <br /> of Water Resources'and Bureau of Reclamation's water right permits that require operation of State Water Project <br /> and Central Valley Project facilities as necessary to comply with the 1000µmhos/cm EC requirement in the southern <br /> Delta. (Revised Water Right Decision 1641,p. 88.) <br /> as The Regional Board recognized that the City could not comply with the 700µmhos/cm standard scheduled to <br /> become effective on April 1, 2005. Therefore,the cease and desist order adopted by the Regional Board placed the <br /> City on a time schedule calling for implementation of the 700 µmhos/cm standard by 2009. <br /> 24 Our conclusion regarding the reasonableness of pursuing reverse osmosis at the present time is influenced by the <br /> fact that the State Board recently adopted a staff report recommending that the periodic review of the 1995 Delta <br /> Plan should consider receiving information relevant to possible revision of the southern Delta water quality <br /> objectives for EC. (State Board Resolution No. 2004-0062.) The staff report states: ". . .staff also recommends <br /> that the implementation recommendation for these[southern Delta EC] objectives be reviewed to ensure that they are <br /> timely described, effective, feasible, and consistent with existing requirements for salinity management in the <br /> southern Delta. To the extent possible,staff recommends that review of this issue be coordinated with the <br /> CVRWQCB's ongoing TMDL and Basin Plan Amendment(BPA) efforts for salt and boron on the San Joaquin <br /> River." (State Board Resolution No. 2004-0062,attachgd staff report,p. 32.) <br /> 14. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.