Laserfiche WebLink
� s <br /> establish that the State Board intended for permit effluent limitations to play a limited role with <br /> respect to achieving compliance with the EC water quality objectives in the southern Delta. <br /> The year-round 1000 µmhos/cm EC effluent limitation in the City's permit that <br /> became effective immediately upon adoption of Order No. R5-2004-0028 is a reasonable <br /> condition that will reduce the salinity of the City's effluent and help achieve compliance with the <br /> receiving water quality objectives in the Basin Plan. The City's shift toward use of lower salinity <br /> surface water for a large portion of its water supply, as well as other source control measures, <br /> should allow the City to comply with the 1000 µmhos/cm requirement." Adoption of a cease <br /> and desist order to ensure that the City pursues the steps necessary to bring it into compliance <br /> with a 1000 µmhos/cm EC effluent limitation is also a reasonable enforcement action. The <br /> record indicates, however, that compliance with the permit effluent limitation of 700 µmhos/cm <br /> EC scheduled to become effective on April 1, 2005, could not be assured without construction <br /> and use of reverse osmosis facilities.21 Construction and operation of reverse osmosis facilities to <br /> treat discharges from the City's WQCF,prior to implementation of other measures to reduce the <br /> salt load in the southern Delta,would not be a reasonable approach.24 <br /> Without prejudging the question of possible revisions to the southern Delta EC <br /> water quality objectives, or the question of the possible conditions that may eventually be <br /> imposed on the City's permit or other permits in order to comply with water quality objectives <br /> for EC in the San Joaquin River and southern Delta, the State Board concludes that establishing <br /> zz Establishing an effluent limitation of 1000µmhos/cm is consistent with the present conditions in the Department <br /> of Water Resources'and Bureau of Reclamation's water right permits that require operation of State Water Project <br /> and Central Valley Project facilities as necessary to comply with the 1000µmhos/cm EC requirement in the southern <br /> Delta. (Revised Water Right Decision 1641,p. 88.) <br /> as The Regional Board recognized that the City could not comply with the 700µmhos/cm standard scheduled to <br /> become effective on April 1, 2005. Therefore,the cease and desist order adopted by the Regional Board placed the <br /> City on a time schedule calling for implementation of the 700 µmhos/cm standard by 2009. <br /> 24 Our conclusion regarding the reasonableness of pursuing reverse osmosis at the present time is influenced by the <br /> fact that the State Board recently adopted a staff report recommending that the periodic review of the 1995 Delta <br /> Plan should consider receiving information relevant to possible revision of the southern Delta water quality <br /> objectives for EC. (State Board Resolution No. 2004-0062.) The staff report states: ". . .staff also recommends <br /> that the implementation recommendation for these[southern Delta EC] objectives be reviewed to ensure that they are <br /> timely described, effective, feasible, and consistent with existing requirements for salinity management in the <br /> southern Delta. To the extent possible,staff recommends that review of this issue be coordinated with the <br /> CVRWQCB's ongoing TMDL and Basin Plan Amendment(BPA) efforts for salt and boron on the San Joaquin <br /> River." (State Board Resolution No. 2004-0062,attachgd staff report,p. 32.) <br /> 14. <br />