Laserfiche WebLink
► create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. <br /> IMPACT ANALYSIS <br /> IMPACT Visual Resources—Impacts on a Scenic Vista. No views on or near the WQCF site or potential pumping <br /> 4.2-1 station sites would be considered a scenic vista. Therefore, development of the project would not alter or <br /> obscure views of a scenic vista. This impact would be less than significant. <br /> A scenic vista is generally considered a view of an area that has remarkable scenery or a resource that is <br /> indigenous to the area. The WQCF site,roadways for the pipeline alignments for the proposed collection system <br /> and recycled-water distribution system,and subdivisions where potential pumping station sites would be located <br /> do not include any aesthetic resources that would be considered a scenic vista because they consist primarily of <br /> existing WQCF structures and agricultural lands that are relatively common in other areas of the city and are not <br /> unique to the surrounding visual setting. Further,because on-site agricultural activities and WQCF structures have <br /> altered the natural landscape,the WQCF site does not provide views of the indigenous natural landscape. <br /> Although the current land uses provide views of an agricultural landscape that is representative of the region,the <br /> WQCF site does not contain resources that are exemplary of the agricultural history of the area(i.e.,historic <br /> structures or landmarks) (see Section 4.12, "Cultural Resources"). Potential pumping station sites would be one- <br /> quarter acre or less and located in developed areas of the city. In addition,pumping stations would be <br /> predominantly below grade. <br /> The proposed pipeline alignments,WQCF, and pumping station sites are generally flat and many are screened by <br /> orchard trees,vegetation, and residential and commercial development.Although some views of the distant Coast <br /> Ranges are available from the WQCF site,no areas that would qualify as a scenic vista are located near the <br /> project sites. Therefore,there is little opportunity for project activities to obscure views of scenic vistas that may <br /> be located outside the proposed pipeline alignments,WQCF, and pumping station sites. Because the project <br /> would not have a substantial adverse affect on a scenic vista,this would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> IMPACT Visual Resources—Damage to Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway. No state scenic <br /> 4.2-2 highways are located within the vicinity of the project area. Therefore, implementation of the project would <br /> not result in damage to scenic resources along a state scenic highway. This impact would be less than <br /> significant. <br /> A scenic resource is generally a resource,landmark, or area that has been noted for its outstanding scenic qualities <br /> and is thereby protected because of those qualities. A scenic resource within a state scenic highway is a resource <br /> that is noted for its outstanding scenic qualities and is visible from a state-designated scenic highway. There are <br /> no scenic state-designated highways or eligible routes, or scenic roadways designated by the City of Manteca or <br /> San Joaquin County, in the immediate project area. The nearest state-designated scenic highway is a segment of I- <br /> 5 approximately 17 miles southwest of the project area;the designation is from the San Joaquin County line north <br /> to SR 205. Because of the large distance between this state-designated scenic highway segment and the project <br /> area,the WQCF and pumping station sites are not visible from this scenic highway segment. Therefore,the <br /> project would have a less-than-significant impact on scenic resources within a state-designated highway. <br /> IMPACT Visual Resources—Impacts on Existing Visual Character. Implementation of the proposed project would <br /> 4.2-3 result in an increase in the number of structures at the WQCF site and would result in the construction of <br /> pumping stations and a side-bank outfall structure. WQCF facilities would be similar in size and mass to <br /> existing structures and would appear to blend with existing facilities at the WQCF. Pumping station and side- <br /> bank outfall facilities would also be similar in size and mass to existing facilities and would appear to blend <br /> with existing residences and outfall structures. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the <br /> existing visual character of the project area. This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 4.2-11 Visual Resources <br />