Laserfiche WebLink
IMPACT Geology,Soils,and Seismicity—Risks to People and Structures Caused by Strong Seismic Ground <br /> 4.7.1 Shaking. The project area is approximately 23 miles from the nearest potentially active fault and is located in <br /> CBC Seismic Zone 3. The proposed facilities would be designed to meet or exceed current state engineering <br /> and design criteria. Further, although not required by the CBC, the City would design its wastewater treatment <br /> facilities to protect against severe seismic events and natural disasters. Therefore, construction of the proposed <br /> project would not expose people and structures to seismic-related structural and nonstructural damage and <br /> associated hazards. This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> According to the California Geological Survey's Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California <br /> and Adjacent Portions of Nevada,there are no type"A"or`B"faults located within 20 miles of the project area. <br /> The area is classified as being in Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 edition of the UBC and the 1998 edition of the <br /> California Building Standards Code(CBC); for this reason,the level of anticipated seismic ground shaking is <br /> lower at the project area than in many areas within the state of California. The nearest potentially active fault is <br /> the Great Valley fault system, approximately 23 miles from the project area,which is estimated to have a <br /> maximum credible earthquake of 6.7 on the Richter scale. <br /> Seismic activity in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area(San Andreas,Hayward, and Calaveras faults) and <br /> the Great Valley Fault System could generate strong ground shaking in the project area. Because of this potential <br /> fault activity, ground shaking is a hazard for facilities in the San Joaquin Valley. Intensity of the ground shaking <br /> would depend on the magnitude of the earthquake,the distance from the epicenter, and the duration of shaking. <br /> The damage sustained and the degree of hazard depends on the seismic hazards of each specific site,the type of <br /> structure and its building materials, and construction quality. The project involves the construction of wastewater <br /> treatment plant improvements,trunk sewers,pumping stations, and an outfall pipeline. The proposed development <br /> would be anticipated to experience at least one major earthquake during the operational lifetime of the project. <br /> Although the project area would not likely experience a fault rupture, ground shaking could cause structural <br /> damage to buildings,wastewater treatment structures,pipelines, and other permanent improvements proposed as <br /> part of the project. <br /> The City of Manteca and project engineers would be required to comply with the provisions of the CBC. Seismic <br /> design provisions of current building codes generally prescribe minimum lateral forces, applied statically to the <br /> structure and combined with the gravity forces of dead-and-live loads. The CBC-prescribed lateral forces <br /> generally are substantially smaller than the expected peak forces that would be associated with a major <br /> earthquake. Therefore,when built according to CBC standards, structures are anticipated to: <br /> ► resist minor earthquakes without damage, <br /> ► resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage but with some nonstructural damage, and <br /> ► resist major earthquakes without collapse but with some structural as well as nonstructural damage. <br /> Conformance to the current building code standards does not constitute any kind of guarantee that significant <br /> structural damage would not occur in the event of a maximum magnitude earthquake; however, it is reasonable to <br /> expect that a well-designed and well-constructed structure would not collapse or cause loss of life in a major <br /> earthquake. <br /> At this time,the CBC requirements (based on the probabilistic seismic event) are considered the design minimum. <br /> Because of the relatively close presence of the Great Valley fault, it is conceivable that the project area may <br /> experience ground shaking more severe than the CBC-specified ground shaking(produced by the more distant <br /> Greenville/March Creek fault),but the probability of occurrence is lower. In the event of a moderate to major <br /> seismic event along the Great Valley fault, ground shaking could result in lateral forces exceeding the capabilities <br /> of structures built to minimum CBC design standards. <br /> Given these conditions, if project structures and facilities are not designed or constructed appropriately, a large <br /> seismic event could expose WQCF,pumping station,wastewater collection system, and recycled water <br /> Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 4-7.17 Geology,Soils,and Seismicity <br />