My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corrosion is the gradual degradation of materials through electrochemical processes resulting from the interaction <br /> between chemical properties of the soil(e.g.,pH,resistivity, and sulfate and chloride concentrations)and metal, <br /> concrete, or stone. Based on a review of available geotechnical reports,no soil testing to evaluate the potential for <br /> corrosion has been conducted at the WQCF site and along proposed wastewater collection system,recycled water <br /> distribution system, and effluent outfall pipeline alignments. In addition, it does not appear that any laboratory <br /> testing by a corrosion engineer has been completed, so no definitive conclusion can be reached regarding the soil <br /> corrosion potential in the project area. However,the City's engineering design process for the project would <br /> ensure the identification of corrosive soils and the implementation of project designs that would minimize damage <br /> to buried concrete slabs, foundations, and buried metal pipes. During the project design process, subsurface soil <br /> conditions would be characterized and a design-level geotechnical investigation conducted. Multiple soil borings <br /> would be staggered throughout the project site or along a pipeline route to capture any change in local soil <br /> conditions. Each soil boring would be logged by a geotechnical engineer and soil samples would be submitted for <br /> subsequent laboratory analysis of specific engineering properties and corrosivity. This process would reveal the <br /> presence or absence of problem soils, and would result in the development of specific engineering <br /> recommendations. For pipeline projects,recommendations would be made in the areas of trench design,backfill <br /> material, and pipeline selection. Methods to address corrosive soils include the use of cathodic protection, <br /> pipeline coatings or wrappings,use of non-metallic pipeline materials, and/or sacrificial anodes to eliminate long- <br /> term maintenance concerns. Because the City's engineering design process for the project would ensure the <br /> identification of corrosive soils and the implementation of project designs that would minimize damage to buried <br /> concrete slabs, foundations, or buried metal pipes, ,this impact would be less than significant. <br /> IMPACT Geology,Soils,and Seismicity—Potential Removal of Mineral Resources.Because sand resources in <br /> 4.7-6 the project area would not be suitable for aggregate mining, the proposed project would result in less-than- <br /> significant impacts to mineral resources. <br /> The project area is located on land classified by the California Department of Mines and Geology as MRZ-3, an <br /> area where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be evaluated from existing data. Results from geotechnical <br /> explorations in 1997(Kleinfelder) at the WQCF site indicated the presence of interbedded sand. Sand has been <br /> extracted from two mining sites in the project vicinity in the past, and sand and gravel mined in San Joaquin <br /> County is used for construction. <br /> Although geotechnical reports prepared for project related elements did identify areas of clean sand,these <br /> occurred as a series of discontinuous, shallow lenses at various depths. In addition, Section 8 of the Manteca <br /> General Plan 2023 Draft Environmental Impact Report did not include any impacts associated with mineral <br /> resources (City of Manteca 2003a). Therefore, sand resources located in the project area including areas in the <br /> vicinity of the proposed wastewater collection system, effluent outfall, and recycled water distribution system <br /> pipeline alignments would not be suitable for economically viable mining activities. Because sand at the WQCF <br /> site occurs as a series of discontinuous shallow lenses, and no mineral resources impacts were documented in the <br /> general plan EIR prepared by the City of Manteca,this impact is considered less-than-significant. <br /> 4.7.3 MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> No mitigation measures are necessary for the following less-than-significant impacts: <br /> 4.7-1: Risks to People and Structures Caused by Strong Seismic Ground Shaking. <br /> 4.7-5: Risk of Structural Damage Caused by Corrosive Soils. <br /> 4.7-6: Potential Removal of Mineral Resources. <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Geology, Soils,and Seismicity 4.7-20 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.