My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reconnaissance surveys, observation of exposed cuts, and possibly subsurface testing, a qualified paleontologist <br /> can determine whether the area should be categorized as having high or low sensitivity. In keeping with the <br /> significance criteria of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology(1995), all vertebrate fossils are generally <br /> categorized as being of potentially significant scientific value. <br /> The significance of potential adverse impacts on paleontological resources under CEQA,resulting from project- <br /> related activities at the proposed project area,was determined using the criteria discussed above. <br /> THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> For purposes of this analysis,the following applicable thresholds of significance have been used to determine <br /> whether implementing the proposed project would result in a significant impact. These thresholds of significance <br /> are based on Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines,viewed in light of the Society of Vertebrate <br /> Paleontology guidelines. The proposed project would result in significant paleontological resources impacts if it <br /> would directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site. For the purposes of this DEIR, an <br /> individual vertebrate fossil specimen may be considered unique or significant if it is identifiable and well <br /> preserved, and it meets one of the following criteria: <br /> ► a type specimen(i.e.,the individual from which a species or subspecies has been described); <br /> ► a member of a rare species; <br /> ► a species that is part of a diverse assemblage (i.e., a site where more than one fossil has been discovered) <br /> wherein other species are also identifiable, and important information regarding life history of individuals can <br /> be drawn; <br /> ► a skeletal element different from, or a specimen more complete than,those now available for its species; or <br /> ► a complete specimen(i.e., all or substantially all of the entire skeleton is present). <br /> The value or importance of different fossil groups varies depending on the age and depositional environment of <br /> the rock unit that contains the fossils,their rarity,the extent to which they have already been identified and <br /> documented, and the ability to recover similar materials under more controlled conditions (such as for a research <br /> project). Marine invertebrates are generally common;the fossil record is well developed and well documented, <br /> and they would generally not be considered a unique paleontological resource. Identifiable vertebrate marine and <br /> terrestrial fossils are generally considered scientifically important because they are relatively rare. <br /> IMPACT ANALYSIS <br /> IMPACT Paleontological Resources—Disturbance of Paleontological Resources During Earthmoving <br /> 4.8-1 Activities.Although no previously recorded paleontological sites are known to occur at the WQCF site, <br /> pumping station sites, or within the proposed collection system and recycled water distribution system <br /> pipeline routes,previously undiscovered paleontological resources could be present in sediments of the <br /> Modesto Formation that underlie the project area. In addition, fossils have been found at excavations in <br /> similar soils less than 2 miles from the project area. Therefore, construction activities could potentially <br /> disturb unknown subsurface paleontological resources. This would be a potentially significant impact. <br /> Based on the records search conducted at UCMP,there are no previously recorded fossil sites along the pipeline <br /> alignments for the proposed collection system and recycled-water distribution system, at the WQCF, along the <br /> proposed outfall pipeline route, or at the side-bank outfall structure. Some of the proposed pipeline routes would <br /> be located within Holocene-age Dune Sand deposits. These deposits are too young to contain fossils; therefore, <br /> project-related construction activities in the Dune Sands would have no impact on paleontological resources. <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Paleontological Resources 4.8-6 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.