Laserfiche WebLink
M m <br /> x p <br /> > Table 2-2 <br /> �- Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> CD <br /> C Significance Significance <br /> Impacts Before Mitigation Measures After <br /> Mitigation Mitigation <br /> Therefore,construction activities could potentially disturb paleontologist or archaeologist. <br /> unknown subsurface paleontological resources. This would be a (2) If paleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving <br /> potentially significant impact. activities,the construction crew shall immediately cease work in <br /> the vicinity of the find and the City Public Works Department <br /> shall be notified.The City will retain a qualified paleontologist <br /> to evaluate the resource and prepare a proposed recovery plan in <br /> accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines <br /> (1995).The recovery plan may include a field survey, <br /> construction monitoring,sampling and data recovery procedures, <br /> museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered,and a <br /> report of findings.Recovery of identified resources will be <br /> implemented by the City before construction activities resume at <br /> the site. <br /> 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> N <br /> 4.9-1:Effects on Potential On-site and Off-site Flooding Risk LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> from Increased Stormwater Runoff.The project would result <br /> in the generation of minor volumes of additional stormwater; <br /> however,adequate stormwater capacity would be available to <br /> covey increased stormwater generated by the project,and the <br /> project would not increase the potential for on-site or off-site <br /> CD <br /> v flooding during storm events.This would be a less-than- <br /> significant impact. <br /> T 4.9-2: Reduction in Groundwater Recharge.The City of LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Manteca does not serve as a substantial groundwater recharge <br /> 0 area. Therefore,proposed development would result in a less- <br /> 0 <br /> than-significant groundwater recharge impact. <br /> 0 4.9-3: Effects of Potential Off-site Flooding Risk from LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Increased Treated Effluent Discharge.Project implementation <br /> would increase the amount of treated effluent discharged into the <br /> D San Joaquin River;however,the incremental amount of treated <br /> 0 v effluent(i.e.,up to 17.13 mgd)discharged into San Joaquin <br /> m River would not be substantial in relation to the total flow rate of <br /> �u' the San Joaquin River.Therefore,the project would not cause <br /> flooding downstream of the WQCF along the San Joaquin River. <br /> Cn <br /> v Cn <br /> m m This is considered a less-than-significant impact. <br /> v M <br /> LTS=Less than Significant S=Significant PS=Potentially Significant SU=Significant and Unavoidable <br />