Laserfiche WebLink
M m <br /> X p <br /> c <br /> < Table 2-2 <br /> CD <br /> Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Significance Significance <br /> Impacts Before Mitigation Measures After <br /> Mitigation Mitigation <br /> with the NPDES permit limits for total coliform bacteria. <br /> Consequently,discharge to the San Joaquin River under the <br /> project would contain pathogen levels sufficiently low to be <br /> protective of human health.Therefore,this impact is considered <br /> less than significant. <br /> 4.9-19: Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Dissolved LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Oxygen Concentrations in Receiving Waters.Dissolved <br /> oxygen(DO)concentrations in the San Joaquin River and Delta <br /> with buildout of the WQCF(27 mgd)would not differ <br /> substantially from those that would occur under future or <br /> existing baseline conditions.Any minor effects that may occur <br /> due to the proposed project would constitute a less-than- <br /> significant impact to water quality.This impact is considered <br /> Ilia <br /> less than significant. <br /> co <br /> 4.9-20: Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Electrical LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Conductivity(EC)Concentrations in Receiving Waters. <br /> Modeling results for EC corresponding to critical and dry/below <br /> normal water years,respectively,demonstrated that the <br /> CD incremental change in EC concentrations at the selected sites <br /> v would be no greater than 2µmho/cm with buildout of the <br /> p WQCF(27 mgd).Further,EC levels at far-field monitoring <br /> T locations would be substantially below adopted Basin Plan water <br /> M quality objectives.Therefore,the project's far-field EC impact <br /> 0- would be less than significant. <br /> 0 <br /> m 4.9-21: Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Dissolved LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> o Organic Carbon(DOC)Concentrations in Receiving <br /> Waters.Projected incremental changes in DOC concentrations <br /> at far-field monitoring locations would be less than 1 percent <br /> Dduring critical water years and less than 3 percent during <br /> E: dry/below normal water years.These changes would not be <br /> substantial in relation to existing DOC concentration.Therefore, <br /> o � the project's far-field DOC impacts would be less than <br /> ZZ v significant. <br /> M <br /> Cn <br /> M m <br /> v �u <br /> LTS=Less than Significant S=Significant PS=Potentially Significant SU=Significant and Unavoidable <br />