Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> w <br /> 1 26 April 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0333 <br /> M <br /> ' Page 5 of 12 <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> 1 1 3 0. REBOUND RESPONSE TEST - GROUND WATER <br /> In accordance with a SJCEHD verbal directive on 13 October 2003,ground water rebound response <br /> ' testing was performed at the site on 14 October 2003 from wells MW-1,MW-2,MW-3 and MW-6 <br /> to evaluate whether or not ground water`spikes' or significant increases in dissolved contamination <br /> would occur following the temporary suspension of ground water extraction and treatment <br /> remediation between 18 September and 20 October 2003 Following the shut-down of the extraction <br /> I and treatment remediation system on 18 September 2003 (26 days), ground water monitoring and <br /> sampling were performed at from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-6 <br /> Prior to groundwater sampling,approximately 5 to 9%z gallons of ground water(a minimum of three <br /> casing-water volumes per well) were evacuated (purged) from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and <br /> ' MW-6 utilizing disposable polyethylene bailers Temperature,pH and conductivity were measured <br /> for stabilization,at regular purge-volume intervals from each well using an Oakton water analyzer <br /> Field data and logs are provided in Appendix D The purged ground water was transferred to the <br /> ' ground water remediation system holding tank for treatment and disposal <br /> { Ground water samples were collected from each of the above purged wells utilizing new, 2-inch <br /> diameter disposable polyethylene bailers Ground water samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA- <br /> approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative Each ground <br /> water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed in a chilled container and transported <br /> to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories, a California DHS-certified laboratory for analysis of <br /> selected petroleum constituents <br /> 4� The analytical results detected TPH-g from wells MW-1,MW-2,MW-3 and MW-6 at concentrations <br /> as high as 50,000 gg/l (MW-6), various BTEX constituents were detected from all four wells at <br /> ' concentrations as high as 5,400 �ig/1 toluene (MW-6), MTBE was detected from all four wells at <br /> concentrations as high as 16,000 gg/l, TAME was detected from all four wells at concentrations as <br /> high as 120 gg/l(MW-2),PCE was detected from wells MW-2,MW-3 and MW-6 at concentrations <br /> +' as'high as 60 pg/1 (MW-6) No other constituents of concern were detected from the ground water <br /> rebound response test Analytical results of ground water monitoring well samples are summarized <br /> in Table 7 The laboratory reports (Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories I D No 0310-100) and <br /> ' t chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix E <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> 4.0. GROUND WATER MONITORING ANDISAMPLING ' <br /> On 17, 18 and r19 November 2003, ground water monitoring and sampling were performed at 47 <br /> ,groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-13) Quarterly ground water monitoring , ' <br /> procedures for the site were outlined in,the AGE-prepared Work Plan Addendum, dated 03 April <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> ` Advanced deoEnvironmental,Inc I <br />