Laserfiche WebLink
Once impacted soils have been removed from the site, confirmation samples will be collected. <br /> If a confirmation result exceeds it corresponding cleanup goal, a determination will be made at <br /> that time in consultation with San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department(SJCEHD) and DTSC if a site-specific background concentration should be <br /> established or if additional remediation is needed. <br /> • Utilize sufficiently low analytical method reporting limits to determine if background <br /> concentrations naturally exceed relevant RSLs. <br /> As outlined in RAP Section 5.4.2, laboratory reporting limits will be sufficiently low to <br /> evaluate if COPC concentrations in the confirmation soil samples exceed their corresponding <br /> residential soil RSLs. (Note again that the cleanup goal for copper will be 3,100 mg/kg, not <br /> 31,000 mg/kg). <br /> • Evaluate the potential for the presence of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAIis) on the <br /> firing range floor and propose how these compounds will be addressed if present. <br /> The Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) guidance document Characterization <br /> and Remediation of Soils at Closed Small Arms Firing Ranges indicates that PAHs are present <br /> in clay targets (which are used at shotgun ranges for trap and skeet shooting). The former <br /> police firing range layout is consistent with the example rifle/handgun firing range layout in <br /> the ITRC guidance document(Section 2.3). Accordingly, clay targets would typically not have <br /> been used and PAHs are not expected to be a COPC at the site. <br /> Additionally, the ITRC guidance document indicates that when present, clay targets did not <br /> exhibit the characteristics of toxicity even though they contained PAHs. The ITRC guidance <br /> further indicates that the primary COPCs at small arms firing ranges are usually metals and a <br /> study published in 2000 found no adverse health effects to human receptors due to PAHs. <br /> Accordingly, we do not propose to evaluate the potential presence of PAHs on the firing range <br /> floor. <br /> • Provide a history of land use of the area of interest prior to use as a firing range. <br /> The City of Manteca purchased this property in 1959 per deed 2341 OR 348 and the site is a <br /> small portion of a 94.5-acre parcel. The land at that time was used for agricultural purposes. <br /> The site was reportedly then used as a firing range from the early 1960's to 2009. <br /> • Provide a legal description of the area addressed by this investigation and corrective <br /> action of the former police firing range. <br /> A legal description does not currently exist.As reported in the RAP,the site occupies a portion <br /> of Assessor Parcel Number 241-310-44. <br /> Please contact us if you have questions regarding our responses to your comments. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> OCL G.� <br /> GEOCON�CJO/N/SJU/L�TANTS,INC. <br /> RICHARD , <br /> 4 W. <br /> DAY Ni <br /> • No. 5479 <br /> Richard Day, PG, Q06, CHG %p Exp.09-30-17 `Q <br /> Principal/Senior Geologist 19>. Q? <br /> FOR Cpt•1F0 <br /> Geocon Project No.E8857-02-01 -2- September 8,2016 <br />